« Back to iGoogle
Random Facts
No preview available

Random Facts

By steven

Random Facts

< 100 users |   60 ratings

Added

1 2 3 4

Comments (30)

Sign in to write a comment for this gadget.

Definition of Google  Allan Palmisano - May 7, 2013 - Report this comment

Steven, Google got it's name from the word "googol" which is a one followed by 100 zeros not a million. You have a interesting gadget, but please check you facts first.

Misinformation  David Jenkins - Apr 3, 2013 - Report this comment

Today's fact about the planet Jupiter, opens with the mistaken statement that Jupiter was named after the Roman name for the god who was called Zeus in Germany. In fact, the planet bears the Roman name for the god who was called Zeus in ancient Greece, not Germany. There is enough bad misinformation out there, please factcheck your facts!

More Inaccuracies  Fabrice Pigelli - Oct 15, 2012 - Report this comment

The "fact" that English farmers have to provide toys for their pigs is complete hogwash. As is the Monumental Axis holding 160 cars (see wiki). And many more. In fact(!) there appear to be more wrong than right.

Innaccuracy  John Dixson - Jul 15, 2012 - Report this comment

Please if you are going to post supposed "random facts" at least verify their validity and don't waste my time. Deleting your stupid lame ass widget untill u send me an e-mail stating ou have fixed the innaccuracies. I may no know how to spell...but I try not to shoot off at the mouth all the time.

Inaccurate   - Patricia Sandoval - Mar 27, 2012 - Report this comment

A number of the facts that I've read on here are just rumors that aren't true. Random Facts aren't facts at all. :P

 - Tony Cino - Mar 24, 2012 - Report this comment

The random facts are frequently wrong and have no verification.

 - snow shack inc snow shack inc - Dec 21, 2011 - Report this comment

Oh and I forgot to say that I love I Google

 - snow shack inc snow shack inc - Dec 21, 2011 - Report this comment

Good fact today sent it to all my friends

Report a policy violation in a comment