Pesquisa Imagens Maps Play YouTube Notícias Gmail Drive Mais »
Fazer login
Usuários de leitores de tela: para usar o modo de acessibilidade, é preciso clicar neste link. O modo de acessibilidade tem os mesmos recursos básicos, mas funciona melhor com seu leitor de tela.

Patentes

  1. Pesquisa avançada de patentes
Número da publicaçãoUS20110167406 A1
Tipo de publicaçãoRequerimento
Número do pedidoUS 12/895,797
Data de publicação7 jul. 2011
Data de depósito30 set. 2010
Data da prioridade5 out. 1999
Também publicado comoUS7810069, US20020016954
Número da publicação12895797, 895797, US 2011/0167406 A1, US 2011/167406 A1, US 20110167406 A1, US 20110167406A1, US 2011167406 A1, US 2011167406A1, US-A1-20110167406, US-A1-2011167406, US2011/0167406A1, US2011/167406A1, US20110167406 A1, US20110167406A1, US2011167406 A1, US2011167406A1
InventoresDietrich Charisius, Alexander Aptus
Cessionário originalBorland Software Corporation
Exportar citaçãoBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Links externos: USPTO, Cessão do USPTO, Espacenet
Methods and systems for relating data structures and object-oriented elements for distributed computing
US 20110167406 A1
Resumo
Methods and systems consistent with the present invention provide an improved software development tool that generates code corresponding to a distributed computing component that contains methods of a plurality of types and that displays a graphical representation of the code with a separately delineated display area for each type. The improved software development tool also compiles, deploys, and debugs the distributed computing component with a client software component using methods and systems consistent with the present invention.
Imagens(44)
Previous page
Next page
Reivindicações(14)
1. (canceled)
2. A method comprising:
selecting a data structure in a database;
receiving an indication of a type of object-oriented element to form from the data structure;
accessing at least a portion of the data structure;
determining the type of object-oriented element to form;
when a determination is made of the type of object-oriented element to form, generating an object-oriented element of the type of object-oriented element to form, the object-oriented element having a name that corresponds to the data structure;
generating source code for the object-oriented element, wherein the object-oriented element includes an attribute related to an attribute field in the data structure; and
storing an identification of the data structure in a comment of the source code.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the storing the identification associates the data structure and the source code.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the selecting the data structure in the database comprises:
determining whether the database has one or more data structures;
displaying an identification of each of the one or more data structures; and
receiving an indication of the data structure.
5. The method of claim 2, further comprising authorizing access to the database.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the authorizing access to the database comprises:
receiving a request to access the database;
receiving access information for the database;
determining if an authorization is used to access the database;
when a determination is made that the authorization is used to access the database, receiving an access privilege; and
determining if the access privilege is authorized.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the access information comprises:
an identification of a database management system;
a driver associated with a software development tool for communicating with the database;
a driver location; and
a database location.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein the access privilege comprises a user name and a password.
9. The method of claim 6, further comprising associating the access information with the source code.
10. The method of claim 2, further comprising displaying a graphical representation of the source code.
11. The method of claim 2, wherein the attribute has an attribute name that corresponds to the attribute field.
12. The method of claim 2, wherein the object-oriented element is a class.
13. The method of claim 2, wherein the object-oriented element is a distributed computing component.
14. A computer-readable medium including instructions for a software development tool to execute a method, the method comprising:
selecting a data structure in a database;
receiving an indication of a type of object-oriented element to form from the data structure;
accessing at least a portion of the data structure;
determining the type of object-oriented element to form;
when a determination is made of the type of object-oriented element to form, generating an object-oriented element of the type of object-oriented element to form, the object-oriented element having a name that corresponds to the data structure;
generating source code for the object-oriented element, wherein the object-oriented element includes an attribute related to an attribute field in the data structure; and
storing an identification of the data structure in a comment of the source code.
Descrição
    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/839,526, filed Apr. 20, 2001 (Attorney Docket No. BOR-006) entitled “Methods and Systems for Relating Data Structures and Object-Oriented Elements for Distributed Computing,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/680,063, filed Oct. 4, 2000 (Attorney Docket No. BOR-094A1) entitled “Method and System for Developing Software,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,851,107, which claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 60/199,046, filed Apr. 21, 2000 (Attorney Docket No. BOR-052P) entitled “Software Development Tool” and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/157,826, filed Oct. 5, 1999 (Attorney Docket No. BOR-094P) entitled “Visual Unified Modeling Language Development Tool,” and is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/839,525, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,983,446, entitled “Methods and Systems for Finding Specific Line Of Source Code,” (Attorney Docket No. BOR-049), filed Apr. 20, 2001, to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/839,645, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,976,243, entitled “Methods and Systems for Finding and Displaying Linked Objects,” (Attorney Docket No. BOR-057), filed Apr. 20, 2001, to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/839,527, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,055,131, entitled “Methods and Systems for Animating the Interaction of Objects in an Object Oriented Program,” (Attorney Docket No. BOR-053), filed Apr. 20, 2001, to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/839,646, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,316, entitled “Distributed Computing Component System with Diagrammatic Graphical Representation of Code with Separate Delineated Display Area by Type,” (Attorney Docket. No. BOR-094A1CIP), filed Apr. 20, 2001, to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/838,580, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,993,759, entitled “Diagrammic Control of Software in a Version Control System,” (Attorney Docket No. BOR-046), filed Apr. 20, 2001, to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/838,578, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,114,149, entitled “Navigation Links in Generated Document,” (Attorney Docket No. BOR-051CIP1), filed Apr. 20, 2001, to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/839,644, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,055,130, entitled “Methods and Systems for Identifying Dependencies Between Object-Oriented Elements,” (Attorney Docket No. BOR-047), filed Apr. 20, 2001, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/839,524, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,188,332, entitled “Methods and Systems for Relating a Data Definition File and a Data Model for Distributed Computing,” (Attorney Docket No, BOR-051CIP3), filed Apr. 20, 2001, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
  • FIELD OF INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The present invention relates generally to data processing systems and, more particularly, to methods and systems for relating data structures and object-oriented elements for distributed computing.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    Computer instructions are written in source code. Although a skilled programmer can understand source code to determine what the code is designed to accomplish, with highly complex software systems, a graphical representation or model of the source code is helpful to organize and visualize the structure and components of the system. Using models, the complex systems are easily identified, and the structural and behavioral patterns can be visualized and documented.
  • [0004]
    The well-known Unified Modeling Language (UML) is a general-purpose notational language for visualizing, specifying, constructing, and documenting complex software systems. UML is used to model systems ranging from business information systems to Web-based distributed systems, to real-time embedded systems. UML formalizes the notion that real-world objects are best modeled as self-contained entities that contain both data and functionality. UML is more clearly described in the following references, which are incorporated herein by reference: (1) Martin Fowler, UML Distilled Second Edition: Applying the Standard Object Modeling Language, Addison-Wesley (1999); (2) Booch, Rumbaugh, and Jacobson, The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Addison-Wesley (1998); (3) Peter Coad, Jeff DeLuca, and Eric Lefebvre, Java Modeling in Color with UML: Enterprise Components and Process, Prentice Hall (1999); and (4) Peter Coad, Mark Mayfield, and Jonathan Kern, Java Design: Building Better Apps & Applets (2 nd Ed.), Prentice Hall (1998).
  • [0005]
    As shown in FIG. 1, conventional software development tools 100 allow a programmer to view UML 102 while viewing source code 104. The source code 104 is stored in a file, and a reverse engineering module 106 converts the source code 104 into a representation of the software project in a database or repository 108. The software project comprises source code 104 in at least one file which, when compiled, forms a sequence of instructions to be run by the data processing system. The repository 108 generates the UML 102. If any changes are made to the UML 102, they are automatically reflected in the repository 108, and a code generator 110 converts the representation in the repository 108 into source code 104. Such software development tools 100, however, do not synchronize the displays of the UML 102 and the source code 104. Rather, the repository 108 stores the representation of the software project while the file stores the source code 104. A modification in the UML 102 does not appear in the source code 104 unless the code generator 110 re-generates the source code 104 from the data in the repository 108. When this occurs, the entire source code 104 is rewritten. Similarly, any modifications made to the source code 104 do not appear in the UML 102 unless the reverse engineering module 106 updates the repository 108. As a result, redundant information is stored in the repository 108 and the source code 104. In addition, rather than making incremental changes to the source code 104, conventional software development tools 100 rewrite the overall source code 104 when modifications are made to the UML 102, resulting in wasted processing time. This type of manual, large-grained synchronization requires either human intervention, or a “batch” style process to try to keep the two views (the UML 102 and the source code 104) in sync. Unfortunately, this approach, adopted by many tools, leads to many undesirable side-effects; such as desired changes to the source code being overwritten by the tool. A further disadvantage with conventional software development tools 100 is that they are designed to only work in a single programming language. Thus, a tool 100 that is designed for Java.™. programs cannot be utilized to develop a program in C++. There is a need in the art for a tool that avoids the limitations of these conventional software development tools.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0006]
    Methods and systems consistent with the present invention provide an improved software development tool that overcomes the limitations of conventional software development tools. The improved software development tool of the present invention allows a developer to simultaneously view a graphical and a textual display of source code. The graphical and textual views are synchronized so that a modification in one view is automatically reflected in the other view. The software development tool is designed for use with more than one programming language.
  • [0007]
    The software development tool also saves a developer time and effort in producing error free code. The software development tool significantly reduces programming development time for a developer by allowing the developer to generate or update source code for an object-oriented element, such as a class or a distributed computing component, from a data structure. Similarly, the software development tool saves a developer time that would be spent manually creating a data structure to map to a previously developed object-oriented element by allowing the developer to form or update a data structure from the object-oriented element.
  • [0008]
    In accordance with methods consistent with the present invention, a method is provided in a data processing system. The data processing system has a memory device with source code and a secondary storage device with a data structure corresponding to the source code. The method comprises the steps of receiving an indication that the data structure has been modified, and automatically reflecting the modification in the source code so as to avoid completely regenerating the source code.
  • [0009]
    In accordance with methods consistent with the present invention, a method is provided in a data processing system. The data processing system has a memory device with source code and a secondary storage device with a data structure corresponding to the source code. The method comprises the steps of receiving an indication that the source code has been modified, and automatically reflecting the modification in the data structure so as to avoid completely regenerating the data structure.
  • [0010]
    In accordance with articles of manufacture consistent with the present invention, a computer-readable medium is provided. The computer-readable medium contains instructions for controlling a data processing system to perform a method. The data processing system has a memory device with source code and a secondary storage device with a data structure corresponding to the source code. The method comprises the steps of receiving an indication that the data structure has been modified, and automatically reflecting the modification in the source code so as to avoid completely regenerating the source code.
  • [0011]
    In accordance with articles of manufacture consistent with the present invention, a computer-readable medium is provided. The computer-readable medium contains instructions for controlling a data processing system to perform a method. The data processing system has a memory device with source code and a secondary storage device with a data structure corresponding to the source code. The method comprises the steps of receiving an indication that the source code has been modified, and automatically reflecting the modification in the data structure so as to avoid completely regenerating the data structure.
  • [0012]
    Additional implementations are directed to systems and computer devices incorporating the methods described above. It is also to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the detailed description to follow are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0013]
    The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate an implementation of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the advantages and principles of the invention. In the drawings,
  • [0014]
    FIG. 1 depicts a conventional software development tool;
  • [0015]
    FIG. 2 depicts an overview of a software development tool in accordance with the present invention;
  • [0016]
    FIG. 3 depicts a data structure of the language-neutral representation created by the software development tool of FIG. 2;
  • [0017]
    FIG. 4 depicts representative source code;
  • [0018]
    FIG. 5 depicts the data structure of the language-neutral representation of the source code of FIG. 4;
  • [0019]
    FIG. 6 depicts a data processing system suitable for practicing the present invention;
  • [0020]
    FIG. 7 depicts an architectural overview of the software development tool of FIG. 2;
  • [0021]
    FIG. 8A depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted in FIG. 2, where the user interface displays a list of predefined criteria which the software development tool checks in the source code;
  • [0022]
    FIG. 8B depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted in FIG. 2, where the user interface displays the definition of the criteria which the software development tool checks in the source code, and an example of source code which does not conform to the criteria;
  • [0023]
    FIG. 8C depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted in FIG. 2, where the user interface displays an example of source code which conforms to the criteria which the software development tool checks in the source code;
  • [0024]
    FIG. 9 depicts a flow diagram of the steps performed by the software development tool depicted in FIG. 2;
  • [0025]
    FIGS. 10A and 10B depict a flow diagram illustrating the update model step of FIG. 9;
  • [0026]
    FIG. 11 depicts a flow diagram of the steps performed by the software development tool in FIG. 2 when creating a class;
  • [0027]
    FIG. 12 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted in FIG. 2, where the user interface displays a use case diagram of source code;
  • [0028]
    FIG. 13 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted in FIG. 2, where the user interface displays both a class diagram and a textual view of source code;
  • [0029]
    FIG. 14 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted in FIG. 2, where the user interface displays a sequence diagram of source code;
  • [0030]
    FIG. 15 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted in FIG. 2, where the user interface displays a collaboration diagram of source code;
  • [0031]
    FIG. 16 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted in FIG. 2, where the user interface displays a statechart diagram of source code;
  • [0032]
    FIG. 17 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted in FIG. 2, where the user interface displays an activity diagram of source code;
  • [0033]
    FIG. 18 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted in FIG. 2, where the user interface displays a component diagram of source code;
  • [0034]
    FIG. 19 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted in FIG. 2, where the user interface displays a deployment diagram of source code;
  • [0035]
    FIG. 20 depicts an exemplary data processing system in which the improved software development tool depicted in FIG. 2 may operate;
  • [0036]
    FIGS. 21A-C depicts a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary process performed by the software development tool for generating source code for an object-oriented element from a data structure in a database;
  • [0037]
    FIG. 22 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool for receiving a request to access a database;
  • [0038]
    FIG. 23 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool for receiving access information for the database;
  • [0039]
    FIG. 24 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool, where the user interface displays an identification of each data structure stored in the database;
  • [0040]
    FIG. 25 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool, where the user interface displays an indication of a type of object-oriented element to form from the database;
  • [0041]
    FIG. 26 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool, where the user interface displays source code for a class that is generated from a selected data structure in the database;
  • [0042]
    FIG. 27 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted, where the user interface displays source code for a Enterprise JavaBean.™. that is generated from a selected data structure in the database;
  • [0043]
    FIG. 28 displays the source code for the Enterprise JavaBean.™. in FIG. 27 that is generated by the software development tool;
  • [0044]
    FIGS. 29A-B depict a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary process performed by the software development tool for updating an object-oriented element from a related data structure in a database;
  • [0045]
    FIG. 30 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool, where the user interface displays source code for a distributed computing component that is updated from the related data structure in the database;
  • [0046]
    FIGS. 31A-B depict a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary process performed by the software development tool for forming a data structure in a database from source code of an object-oriented element.
  • [0047]
    FIG. 32 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool for receiving a request to form a data structure in a database;
  • [0048]
    FIG. 33 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool for receiving an indication of an object-oriented element to use to form the data structure;
  • [0049]
    FIG. 34 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool for receiving access information for the database and for receiving a request to generate the data structure in the database;
  • [0050]
    FIG. 35 depicts a user interface displayed by the software development tool depicted, where the user interface displays a location for storing the data structure formed from source code of the object-oriented element; and
  • [0051]
    FIGS. 36A-B depict a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary process performed by the software development tool for updating a data structure in a database from a related object-oriented element; and
  • [0052]
    FIG. 37 depicts an Enterprise JavaBean™ server interacting with other systems.
  • [0053]
    Reference will now be made in detail to the description of the invention as illustrated in the drawings. While the invention will be described in connection with these drawings, there is no intent to limit it to the embodiment or embodiments disclosed therein. On the contrary, the intent is to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0054]
    Methods and systems consistent with the present invention provide an improved software development tool that creates a graphical representation of source code regardless of the programming language in which the code is written. In addition, the software development tool simultaneously reflects any modifications to the source code to both the display of the graphical representation as well as the textual display of the source code.
  • [0055]
    As depicted in FIG. 2, source code 202 is being displayed in both a graphical form 204 and a textual form 206. In accordance with methods and systems consistent with the present invention, the improved software development tool generates a transient meta model (TMM) 200 which stores a language-neutral representation of the source code 202. The graphical 204 and textual 206 representations of the source code 202 are generated from the language-neutral representation in the TMM 200. Alternatively, the textual view 206 of the source code may be obtained directly from the source code file. Although modifications made on the displays 204 and 206 may appear to modify the displays 204 and 206, in actuality all modifications are made directly to the source code 202 via an incremental code editor (ICE) 208, and the TMM 200 is used to generate the modifications in both the graphical 204 and the textual 206 views from the modifications to the source code 202.
  • [0056]
    The improved software development tool provides simultaneous round-trip engineering, i.e., the graphical representation 204 is synchronized with the textual representation 206. Thus, if a change is made to the source code 202 via the graphical representation 204, the textual representation 206 is updated automatically. Similarly, if a change is made to the source code 202 via the textual representation 206, the graphical representation 204 is updated to remain synchronized. There is no repository, no batch code generation, and no risk of losing code.
  • [0057]
    The data structure 300 of the language-neutral representation is depicted in FIG. 3. The data structure 300 comprises a Source Code Interface (SCI) model 302, an SCI package 304, an SCI class 306, and an SCI member 308. The SCI model 302 is the source code organized into packages. The SCI model 302 corresponds to a directory for a software project being developed by the user, and the SCI package 304 corresponds to a subdirectory. The software project comprises the source code in at least one file that is compiled to form a sequence of instructions to be run by a data processing system. The data processing system is discussed in detail below. As is well known in object-oriented programming, the class 306 is a category of objects which describes a group of objects with similar properties (attributes), common behavior (operations or methods), common relationships to other objects, and common semantics. The members 308 comprise attributes and/or operations.
  • [0058]
    For example, the data structure 500 for the source code 400 depicted in FIG. 4 is depicted in FIG. 5. UserInterface 402 is defined as a package 404. Accordingly, UserInterface 402 is contained in SCI package 502. Similarly, Bank 406, which is defined as a class 408, is contained in SCI class 504, and Name 410 and Assets 412, which are defined as attributes (strings 414), are contained in SCI members 506. Since these elements are in the same project, all are linked. The data structure 500 also identifies the language in which the source code is written 508, e.g., the Java.™. language.
  • [0059]
    FIG. 6 depicts a data processing system 600 suitable for practicing methods and systems consistent with the present invention. Data processing system 600 comprises a memory 602, a secondary storage device 604, an I/O device 606, and a processor 608. Memory 602 includes the improved software development tool 610. The software development tool 610 is used to develop a software project 612, and create the TMM 200 in the memory 602. The project 612 is stored in the secondary storage device 604 of the data processing system 600. One skilled in the art will recognize that data processing system 600 may contain additional or different components.
  • [0060]
    Although aspects of the present invention are described as being stored in memory, one skilled in the art will appreciate that these aspects can also be stored on or read from other types of computer-readable media, such as secondary storage devices, like hard disks, floppy disks or CD-ROM; a carrier wave from a network, such as Internet; or other forms of RAM or ROM either currently known or later developed.
  • [0061]
    FIG. 7 illustrates an architectural overview of the improved software development tool 610. The tool 610 comprises a core 700, an open application program interface (API) 702, and modules 704. The core 700 includes a parser 706 and an ICE 208. The parser 706 converts the source code into the language-neutral representation in the TMM, and the ICE 208 converts the text from the displays into source code. There are three main packages composing the API 702: Integrated Development Environment (IDE) 708; Read-Write Interface (RWI) 710; and Source Code Interface (SCI) 712. Each package includes corresponding subpackages. As is well known in the art, a package is a collection of classes, interfaces, attributes, notifications, operations, or behaviors that are treated as a single module or program unit.
  • [0062]
    IDE 708 is the API 702 needed to generate custom outputs based on information contained in a model. It is a read-only interface, i.e., the user can extract information from the model, but not change the model. IDE 708 provides the functionality related to the model's representation in IDE 708 and interaction with the user. Each package composing the IDE group has a description highlighting the areas of applicability of this concrete package.
  • [0063]
    RWI 710 enables the user to go deeper into the architecture. Using RWI 710, information can be extracted from and written to the models. RWI not only represents packages, classes and members, but it may also represent different diagrams (class diagrams, use case diagrams, sequence diagrams and others), links, notes, use cases, actors, states, etc.
  • [0064]
    SCI 712 is at the source code level, and allows the user to work with the source code almost independently of the language being used.
  • [0065]
    There are a variety of modules 704 in the software development tool 610 of the present invention. Some of the modules 704 access information to generate graphical and code documentation in custom formats, export to different file formats, or develop patterns. The software development tool also includes a quality assurance (QA) module which monitors the modifications to the source code and calculates various complexity metrics, i.e., various measurements of the program's performance or efficiency, to support quality assurance. The types of metrics calculated by the software development tool include basic metrics, cohesion metrics, complexity metrics, coupling metrics, Halstead metrics, inheritance metrics, maximum metrics, polymorphism metrics, and ratio metrics. Examples of these metrics with their respective definitions are identified in Tables 1-9 below.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 1
    Basic Metrics
    Basic Metrics Description
    Lines Of Code Counts the number of code lines.
    Number Of Attributes Counts the number of attributes. If a class has a high number of
    attributes, it may be appropriate to divide it into subclasses.
    Number Of Classes Counts the number of classes.
    Number Of Import Counts the number of imported packages/classes. This measure
    Statements can highlight excessive importing, and also can be used as a
    measure of coupling.
    Number Of Members Counts the number of members, i.e., attributes and operations. If
    a class has a high number of members, it may be appropriate to
    divide it into subclasses.
    Number Of Operations Counts the number of operations. If a class has a high, number of
    operations, it may be appropriate to divide it into subclasses.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 2
    Cohesion Metrics
    Cohesion Metrics Description
    Lack Of Cohesion Of Takes each pair of methods in the class and determines the set of
    Methods 1 fields they each access. A low value indicates high coupling
    between methods, which indicates potentially low reusability and
    increased testing because many methods can affect the same
    attributes.
    Lack Of Cohesion Of Counts the percentage of methods that do not access a specific
    Methods 2 attribute averaged over all attributes in the class. A high value of
    cohesion (a low lack of cohesion) implies that the class is well
    designed.
    Lack Of Cohesion Of Measures the dissimilarity of methods in a class by attributes. A
    Methods 3 low value indicates good class subdivision, implying simplicity
    and high reusability. A high lack of cohesion increases
    complexity, thereby increasing the likelihood of errors during the
    development process.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 3
    Complexity Metrics
    Complexity Metrics Description
    Attribute Complexity Defined as the sum of each attribute's value in the class.
    Cyclomatic Represents the cognitive complexity of the class. It counts the
    Complexity number of possible paths through an algorithm by counting the
    number of distinct regions on a flowgraph, i.e., the number of ‘if,’
    ‘for’ and ‘while’ statements in the operation's body.
    Number Of Remote Processes all of the methods and constructors, and counts the
    Methods number of different remote methods called. A remote method is
    defined as a method which is not declared in either the class itself
    or its ancestors.
    Response For Class Calculated as ‘Number of Local Methods’ + ‘Number of Remote
    Methods.’ A class which provides a larger response set is
    considered to be more complex and requires more testing than
    one with a smaller overall design complexity.
    Weighted Methods Per The sum of the complexity of all methods for a class, where each
    Class 1 method is weighted by its cyclomatic complexity. The number of
    methods and the complexity of the methods involved is a
    predictor of how much time and effort is required to develop and
    maintain the class.
    Weighted Methods Per Measures the complexity of a class, assuming that a class with
    Class 2 more methods than another is more complex, and that a method
    with more parameters than another is also likely to be more
    complex.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 4
    Coupling Metrics
    Coupling Metrics Description
    Coupling Between Represents the number of other classes to which a class is
    Objects coupled. Counts the number of reference types that are used in
    attribute declarations, formal parameters, return types, throws
    declarations and local variables, and types from which attribute
    and method selections are made.
    Excessive coupling between objects is detrimental to modular
    design and prevents reuse. The more independent a class is, the
    easier it is to reuse it in another application. In order to improve
    modularity and promote encapsulation, inter-object class couples
    should be kept to a minimum. The larger the number of couples,
    the higher the sensitivity to changes in other parts of the design,
    and therefore maintenance is more difficult. A measure of
    coupling is useful to determine how complex the testing of
    various parts of a design is likely to be. The higher the inter-
    object class coupling, the more rigorous the testing needs to be.
    Data Abstraction Counts the number of reference types used in the attribute
    Coupling declarations.
    FanOut Counts the number of reference types that are used in attribute
    declarations, formal parameters, return types, throws declarations
    and local variables.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 5
    Halstead Metrics
    Halstead Metrics Description
    Halstead Difficulty This measure is one of the Halstead Software Science metrics. It
    is calculated as (‘Number of Unique Operators’/‘Number of
    Unique Operands’) * (‘Number of Operands’/‘Number of
    Unique Operands’).
    Halstead Effort This measure is one of the Halstead Software Science metrics. It
    is calculated as ‘Halstead Difficulty’ * ‘Halstead Program
    Volume.’
    Halstead Program This measure is one of the Halstead Software Science metrics. It
    Length is calculated as ‘Number of Operators’ + ‘Number of Operands.’
    Halstead Program This measure is one of the Halstead Software Science metrics. It
    Vocabulary is calculated as ‘Number of Unique Operators’ + ‘Number of
    Unique Operands.’
    Halstead Program This measure is one of the Halstead Software Science metrics. It
    Volume is calculated as ‘Halstead Program Length’ * Log2(‘Halstead
    Program Vocabulary’).
    Number Of Operands This measure is used as an input to the Halstead Software Science
    metrics. It counts the number of operands used in a class.
    Number Of Operators This measure is used as an input to the Halstead Software Science
    metrics. It counts the number of operators used in a class.
    Number Of Unique This measure is used as an input to the Halstead Software Science
    Operands metrics. It counts the number of unique operands used in a class.
    Number Of Unique This measure is used as an input to the Halstead Software Science
    Operators metrics. It counts the number of unique operators used in a class.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 6
    Inheritance Metrics
    Inheritance Metrics Description
    Depth Of Inheritance Counts how far down the inheritance hierarchy a class or
    Hierarchy interface is declared. High values imply that a class is quite
    specialized.
    Number Of Child Counts the number of classes which inherit from a particular
    Classes class, i.e., the number of classes in the inheritance tree down from
    a class. Non-zero value indicates that the particular class is being
    re-used. The abstraction of the class may be poor if there are too
    many child classes. It should also be stated that a high value of
    this measure points to the definite amount of testing required for
    each child class.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 7
    Maximum Metrics
    Maximum Metrics Description
    Maximum Number Of Counts the maximum depth of ‘if,’ ‘for’ and ‘while’ branches in
    Levels the bodies of methods. Logical units with a large number of
    nested levels may need implementation simplification and
    process improvement because groups that contain more than
    seven pieces of information are increasingly harder for people to
    understand in problem solving.
    Maximum Number Of Displays the maximum number of parameters among all class
    Parameters operations. Methods with many parameters tend to be more
    specialized and, thus, are less likely to be reusable.
    Maximum Size Of Counts the maximum size of the operations for a class. Method
    Operation size is determined in terms of cyclomatic complexity, i.e., the
    number of ‘if,’ ‘for’ and ‘while’ statements in the operation's
    body.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 8
    Polymorphism Metrics
    Polymorphism
    Metrics Description
    Number Of Added Counts the number of operations added by a class. A large value
    Methods of this measure indicates that the functionality of the given class
    becomes increasingly distinct from that of the parent classes. In
    this case, it should be considered whether this class genuinely
    should be inheriting from the parent, or if it could be broken
    down into several smaller classes.
    Number Of Counts the number of inherited operations which a class
    Overridden Methods overrides. Classes without parents are not processed. High
    values tend to indicate design problems, i.e., subclasses should
    generally add to and extend the functionality of the parent classes
    rather than overriding them.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 9
    Ratio Metrics
    Ratio Metrics Description
    Comment Ratio Counts the ratio of comments to total lines of code including
    comments.
    Percentage Of Package Counts the percentage of package members in a class.
    Members
    Percentage Of Private Counts the percentage of private members in a class.
    Members
    Percentage Of Counts the percentage of protected members in a class.
    Protected Members
    Percentage Of Public Counts the proportion of vulnerable members in a class. A large
    Members proportion of such members means that the class has high
    potential to be affected by external classes and means that
    increased efforts will be needed to test such a class thoroughly.
    True Comment Ratio Counts the ratio of comments to total lines of code excluding
    comments.
  • [0066]
    The QA module also provides audits, i.e., the module checks for conformance to pre-defined or user-defined styles. The types of audits provided by the module include coding style, critical errors, declaration style, documentation, naming style, performance, possible errors and superfluous content. Examples of these audits with their respective definitions are identified in Tables 10-17 below.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 10
    Coding Style Audits
    Coding Style Audits Description
    Access Of Static Static members should be referenced through class names rather
    Members Through than through objects.
    Objects
    Assignment to Formal Formal parameters should not be assigned.
    Parameters
    Complex Assignment Checks for the occurrence of multiple assignments and
    assignments to variables within the same expression. Complex
    assignments should be avoided since they decrease program
    readability.
    Don't Use the The negation operator slows down the readability of the program.
    Negation Operator Thus, it is recommended that it not be used frequently.
    Frequently
    Operator ‘?:’ May Not The operator ‘?:’ makes the code harder to read than the
    Be Used alternative form with an if-statement.
    Provide Incremental In Checks if the third argument of the ‘for’-statement missing.
    For-Statement or use
    while-statement
    Replacement For Demand import-declarations must be replaced by a list of single
    Demand Imports import-declarations that are actually imported into the
    compilation unit. In other words, import-statements may not end
    with an asterisk.
    Use Abbreviated Use the abbreviated assignment operator in order to write
    Assignment Operator programs more rapidly. Also some compilers run faster with the
    abbreviated assignment operator.
    Use ‘this’ Explicitly Tries to make the developer use ‘this’ explicitly when trying to
    To Access Class access class members. Using the same class member names with
    Members parameter names often makes what the developer is referring to
    unclear.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 11
    Critical Errors Audits
    Critical Errors Audits Description
    Avoid Hiding Detects when attributes declared in child classes hide inherited
    Inherited Attributes attributes.
    Avoid Hiding Detects when inherited static operations are hidden by child
    Inherited Static classes.
    Methods
    Command Query Prevents methods that return a value from a modifying state. The
    Separation methods used to query the state of an object must be different
    from the methods used to perform commands (change the state of
    the object).
    Hiding Of Names Declarations of names should not hide other declarations of the
    same name.
    Inaccessible Overload resolution only considers constructors and methods that
    Constructor Or are visible at the point of the call. If, however, all the
    Method Matches constructors and methods were considered, there may be more
    matches. This rule is violated in this case.
    Imagine that ClassB is in a different package than ClassA. Then
    the allocation of ClassB violates this rule since the second
    constructor is not visible at the point of the allocation, but it still
    matches the allocation (based on signature). Also the call to open
    in ClassB violates this rule since the second and the third
    declarations of open are not visible at the point of the call, but it
    still matches the call (based on signature).
    Multiple Visible Multiple declarations with this same name must not be
    Declarations With simultaneously visible except for overloaded methods.
    Same Name
    Overriding a Non- Checks for abstract methods overriding non-abstract methods in a
    Abstract Method With subclass.
    an Abstract Method
    Overriding a Private A subclass should not contain a method with the same name and
    Method signature as in a superclass if these methods are declared to be
    private.
    Overloading Within a A superclass method may not be overloaded within a subclass
    Subclass unless all overloading in the superclass are also overridden in the
    subclass. It is very unusual for a subclass to be overloading
    methods in its superclass without also overriding the methods it is
    overloading. More frequently this happens due to inconsistent
    changes between the superclass and subclass - i.e., the intention
    of the user is to override the method in the superclass, but due to
    the error, the subclass method ends up overloading the superclass
    method.
    Use of Static Attribute Non-final static attributes should not be used in initializations of
    for Initialization attributes.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 12
    Declaration Style Audits
    Declaration Style
    Audits Description
    Badly Located Array Array declarators must be placed next to the type descriptor of
    Declarators their component type.
    Constant Private Private attributes that never get their values changed must be
    Attributes Must Be declared final. By explicitly declaring them in such a way, a
    Final reader of the source code get some information of how the
    attribute is supposed to be used.
    Constant Variables Local variables that never get their values changed must be
    Must Be Final declared final. By explicitly declaring them in such a way, a
    reader of the source code obtains information about how the
    variable is supposed to be used.
    Declare Variables In Several variables (attributes and local variables) should not be
    One Statement Each declared in the same statement.
    Instantiated Classes This rule recommends making all instantiated classes final. It
    Should Be Final checks classes which are present in the object model. Classes
    from search/classpath are ignored.
    List All Public And Enforces a standard to improve readability. Methods/data in your
    Package Members class should be ordered properly.
    First
    Order Of Appearance Checks for correct ordering of modifiers. For classes, this
    Of Modifiers includes visibility (public, protected or private), abstract, static,
    final. For attributes, this includes visibility (public, protected or
    private), static, final, transient, volatile. For operations, this
    includes visibility (public, protected or private), abstract, static,
    final, synchronized, native.
    Put the Main Function Tries to make the program comply with various coding standards
    Last regarding the form of the class definitions.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 13
    Documentation Audits
    Documentation
    Audits Description
    Bad Tag In JavaDoc This rule verifies code against accidental
    Comments use of improper JavaDoc tags.
    Distinguish Between Checks whether the JavaDoc comments in your
    JavaDoc And program ends with ‘**/’ and ordinary C-style
    Ordinary Comments ones with ‘*/.’
  • [0000]
    TABLE 14
    Naming Style Audits
    Naming Style Audits Description
    Class Name Must Checks whether top level classes or
    Match Its File Name interfaces have the same name as the file
    in which they reside.
    Group Operations Enforces standard to improve readability.
    With Same Name
    Together
    Naming Conventions Takes a regular expression and item name and
    reports all occurrences where the pattern does
    not match the declaration.
    Names Of Exception Names of classes which inherit from Exception
    Classes should end with Exception.
    Use Conventional One-character local variable or parameter names
    Variable Names should be avoided, except for temporary and
    looping variables, or where a variable holds an
    undistinguished value of a type.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 15
    Performance Audits
    Performance Audits Description
    Avoid Declaring This rule recommends declaring local variables
    Variables Inside outside the loops since declaring variables
    Loops inside the loop is less efficient.
    Append To String Performance enhancements can be obtained by
    Within a Loop replacing String operations with StringBuffer
    operations if a String object is appended
    within a loop.
    Complex Loop Avoid using complex expressions as repeat
    Expressions conditions within loops.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 16
    Possible Error Audits
    Possible Error Audits Description
    Avoid Public And Declare the attributes either private or protected, and provide
    Package Attributes operations to access or change them.
    Avoid Statements Avoid statements with empty body.
    With Empty Body
    Assignment To For- ‘For’-loop variables should not be assigned.
    Loop Variables
    Don't Compare Avoid testing for equality of floating point numbers since
    Floating Point Types floating-point numbers that should be equal are not always equal
    due to rounding problems.
    Enclosing Body The statement of a loop must always be a block. The ‘then’ and
    Within a Block ‘else’ parts of ‘if’-statements must always be blocks. This makes
    it easier to add statements without accidentally introducing bugs
    in case the developer forgets to add braces.
    Explicitly Initialize Explicitly initialize all variables. The only reason not to initialize
    All Variables a variable is where it's declared is if the initial value depends on
    some computation occurring first.
    Method finalize( ) Calling of super.finalize( ) from finalize( ) is good practice of
    Doesn't Call programming, even if the base class doesn't define the finalize( )
    super.finalize( ) method. This makes class implementations less dependent on
    each other.
    Mixing Logical An expression containing multiple logical operators should be
    Operators Without parenthesized properly.
    Parentheses
    No Assignments In Use of assignment within conditions makes the source code hard
    Conditional to understand.
    Expressions
    Use ‘equals’ Instead The ‘==’ operator used on strings checks if two string objects are
    Of ‘==’ two identical objects. In most situations, however, one likes to
    simply check if two strings have the same value. In these cases,
    the ‘equals’ method should be used.
    Use ‘L’ Instead Of ‘l’ It is better to use uppercase ‘L’ to distinguish the letter ‘l’ from
    at the end of integer the number ‘1’.
    constant
    Use Of the The ‘synchronized’ modifier on methods can sometimes cause
    ‘synchronized’ confusion during maintenance as well as during debugging. This
    Modifier rule therefore recommends against using this modifier, and
    instead recommends using ‘synchronized’ statements as
    replacements.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 17
    Superfluous Content Audits
    Superfluous Content
    Audits Description
    Duplicate Import There should be at most one import declaration that imports a
    Declarations particular class/package.
    Don't Import the No classes or interfaces need to be imported from the package to
    Package the Source which the source code file belongs. Everything in that package is
    File Belongs To available without explicit import statements.
    Explicit Import Of the Explicit import of classes from the package ‘java.lang’ should not
    java.lang Classes be performed.
    Equality Operations Avoid performing equality operations on Boolean operands.
    On Boolean ‘True’ and ‘false’ literals should not be used in conditional
    Arguments clauses.
    Imported Items Must It is not legal to import a class or an interface and never use it.
    Be Used This rule checks classes and interfaces that are explicitly
    imported with their names - that is not with import of a complete
    package, using an asterisk. If unused class and interface imports
    are omitted, the amount of meaningless source code is reduced -
    thus the amount of code to be understood by a reader is
    minimized.
    Unnecessary Casts Checks for the use of type casts that are not necessary.
    Unnecessary Verifies that the runtime type of the left-hand side expression is
    ‘instanceof’ the same as the one specified on the right-hand side.
    Evaluations
    Unused Local Local variables and formal parameter declarations must be used.
    Variables And Formal
    Parameters
    Use Of Obsolete The modifier ‘abstract’ is considered obsolete and should not be
    Interface Modifier used.
    Use Of Unnecessary All interface operations are implicitly public and abstract. All
    Interface Member interface attributes are implicitly public, final and static.
    Modifiers
    Unused Private Class An unused class member might indicate a logical flaw in the
    Member program. The class declaration has to be reconsidered in order to
    determine the need of the unused member(s).
  • [0067]
    If the QA module determines that the source code does not conform, an error message is provided to the developer. For example, as depicted in FIG. 8A, the software development tool checks for a variety of coding styles 800. If the software development tool were to check for “Access Of Static Members Through Objects” 802, it would verify whether static members are referenced through class names rather than through objects 804. Further, as depicted in FIG. 8B, if the software development tool were to check for “Complex Assignment” 806, the software development tool would check for the occurrence of multiple assignments and assignments to variables within the same expression to avoid complex assignments since these decrease program readability 808. An example of source code having a complex assignment 810 and source code having a non-complex assignment 812 are depicted in FIGS. 8B and 8C, respectively. The QA module of the software development tool scans the source code for other syntax errors and/or other deviations from well known rules, as described above, and provides an error message if any such errors are detected.
  • [0068]
    The improved software development tool of the present invention is used to develop source code in a project. The project comprises a plurality of files and the source code of a chosen one of the plurality of files is written in a given language. The software development tool determines the language of the source code of the chosen file, converts the source code from the language into a language-neutral representation, uses the language-neutral representation to textually display the source code of the chosen file in the language, and uses the language-neutral representation to display a graphical representation of at least a portion of the project. As discussed above, in an alternative embodiment, the textual display may be obtained directly from the source code file. The source code and the graphical representation are displayed simultaneously.
  • [0069]
    The improved software development tool of the present invention is also used to develop source code. The software development tool receives an indication of a selected language for the source code, creates a file to store the source code in the selected language, converts the source code from the selected language into a language-neutral representation, uses the language-neutral representation to display the source code of the file, and uses the language-neutral representation to display a graphical representation of the file. Again, the source code and the graphical representation are displayed simultaneously.
  • [0070]
    Moreover, if the source code in the file is modified, the modified source code and a graphical representation of at least a portion of the modified source code are displayed simultaneously. The QA module of the software development tool provides an error message if the modification does not conform to pre-defined or user-defined styles, as described above. The modification to the source code may be received by the software development tool via the programmer editing the source code in the textual pane or the graphical pane, or via some other independent software tool that the programmer uses to modify the code. The graphical representation of the project may be in Unified Modeling Language; however, one skilled in the art will recognize that other graphical representations of the source code may be displayed. Further, although the present invention is described and shown using the various views of the UML, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that other views may be displayed.
  • [0071]
    FIG. 9 depicts a flow diagram of the steps performed by the software development tool to develop a project in accordance with methods consistent with the present invention. As previously stated, the project comprises a plurality of files. The developer either uses the software development tool to open a file that contains existing source code, or to create a file in which the source code will be developed. If the software development tool is used to open the file, determined in step 900, the software development tool initially determines the programming language in which the code is written (step 902). The language is identified by the extension of the file, e.g., “.java” identifies source code written in the Java.™. language, while “.cpp” identifies source code written in C++. The software development tool then obtains a template for the current programming language, i.e., a collection of generalized definitions for the particular language that can be used to build the data structure (step 904). For example, the templates used to define a new Java.™. class contains a default name, e.g., “Class1,” and the default code, “public class Class1 { }.” Such templates are well known in the art. For example, the “Microsoft Foundation Class Library” and the “Microsoft Word Template For Business Use Case Modeling” are examples of standard template libraries from which programmers can choose individual template classes. The software development tool uses the template to parse the source code (step 906), and create the data structure (step 908). After creating the data structure or if there is no existing code, the software development tool awaits an event, i.e., a modification or addition to the source code by the developer (step 910). If an event is received and the event is to close the file (step 912), the file is saved (step 914) and closed (step 916). Otherwise, the software development tool performs the event (step 918), i.e., the tool makes the modification. The software development tool then updates the TMM or model (step 920), as discussed in detail below, and updates both the graphical and the textual views (step 922).
  • [0072]
    FIGS. 10A and 10B depict a flow diagram illustrating the update model step of FIG. 9. The software development tool selects a file from the project (step 1000), and determines whether the file is new (step 1002), whether the file has been updated (step 1004), or whether the file has been deleted (step 1006). If the file is new, the software development tool adds the additional symbols from the file to the TMM (step 1008). To add the symbol to the TMM, the software development tool uses the template to parse the symbol to the TMM. If the file has been updated, the software development tool updates the symbols in the TMM (step 1010). Similar to the addition of a symbol to the TMM, the software development tool uses the template to parse the symbol to the TMM. If the file has been deleted, the software development tool deletes the symbols in the TMM (step 1012). The software development tool continues this analysis for all files in the project. After all files are analyzed (step 1014), any obsolete symbols in the TMM (step 1016) are deleted (step 1018).
  • [0073]
    FIG. 11 depicts a flow diagram illustrating the performance of an event. specifically the creation of a class, in accordance with methods consistent with the present invention. After identifying the programming language (step 1100), the software development tool obtains a template for the language (step 1102), creates a source code file in the project directory (step 1104), and pastes the template into the file (step 1106). The project directory corresponds to the SCI model 302 of FIG. 3. Additional events which a developer may perform using the software development tool include the creation, modification or deletion of packages, projects, attributes, interfaces, links, operations, and the closing of a file.
  • [0074]
    The software development tool is collectively broken into three views of the application: the static view, the dynamic view, and the functional view. The static view is modeled using the use-case and class diagrams. A use case diagram 1200, depicted in FIG. 12, shows the relationship among actors 1202 and use cases 1204 within the system 1206. A class diagram 1300, depicted in FIG. 13 with its associated source code 1302, on the other hand, includes classes 1304, interfaces, packages and their relationships connected as a graph to each other and to their contents.
  • [0075]
    The dynamic view is modeled using the sequence, collaboration and statechart diagrams. As depicted in FIG. 14, a sequence diagram 1400 represents an interaction, which is a set of messages 1402 exchanged among objects 1404 within a collaboration to effect a desired operation or result. In a sequence diagram 1400, the vertical dimension represents time and the horizontal dimension represents different objects. A collaboration diagram 1500, depicted in FIG. 15, is also an interaction with messages 1502 exchanged among objects 1504, but it is also a collaboration, which is a set of objects 1504 related in a particular context. Contrary to sequence diagrams 1400 (FIG. 14), which emphasize the time ordering of messages along the vertical axis, collaboration diagrams 1500 (FIG. 15) emphasize the structural organization of objects.
  • [0076]
    A statechart diagram 1600 is depicted in FIG. 16. The statechart diagram 1600 includes the sequences of states 1602 that an object or interaction goes through during its life in response to stimuli, together with its responses and actions. It uses a graphic notation that shows states of an object, the events that cause a transition from one state to another, and the actions that result from the transition.
  • [0077]
    The functional view can be represented by activity diagrams 1700 and more traditional descriptive narratives such as pseudocode and minispecifications. An activity diagram 1700 is depicted in FIG. 17, and is a special case of a state diagram where most, if not all, of the states are action states 1702 and where most, if not all, of the transitions are triggered by completion of the actions in the source states. Activity diagrams 1700 are used in situations where all or most of the events represent the completion of internally generated actions.
  • [0078]
    There is also a fourth view mingled with the static view called the architectural view. This view is modeled using package, component and deployment diagrams. Package diagrams show packages of classes and the dependencies among them. Component diagrams 1800, depicted in FIG. 18, are graphical representations of a system or its component parts. Component diagrams 1800 show the dependencies among software components, including source code components, binary code components and executable components. As depicted in FIG. 19, Deployment diagrams 1900 are used to show the distribution strategy for a distributed object system. Deployment diagrams 1900 show the configuration of run-time processing elements and the software components, processes and objects that live on them.
  • [0079]
    Although discussed in terms of class diagrams, one skilled in the art will recognize that the software development tool of the present invention may support these and other graphical views.
  • [0080]
    Relating a Data Structure and Object-oriented Element for Distributed Computing
  • [0081]
    In addition to the functionality described above, the software development tool significantly reduces programming development time for a developer by allowing the developer to automatically generate an Enterprise JavaBean.™. (EJB) or a persistent class from a database table and automatically generate a database table from an EJB or a persistent class. Furthermore, when the EJB or persistent class is modified, the software development tool is able to automatically update the corresponding database table so as to keep the EJB or persistent class and the corresponding database table in synchronization. Similarly, when the database table corresponding to the EJB or persistent class is updated, the software development tool is able to automatically update the EJB or persistent class.
  • [0082]
    As is well known to one skilled in the art, a persistent class has attributes that are mapped to a database table and whose state is maintained between calls to operations within code corresponding to the persistent class. Because the software development tool is able to relate a database table to a persistent class, the software development tool saves the programmer time in developing and maintaining code that includes these attributes by generating and updating code for these attributes from a corresponding database table. Also, as is well known to one skilled in the art, an EJB serves as a front-end to a DBMS, where the EJB embodies business logic that is performed on the data in the database associated with the DBMS. The data in the database represents the specific details and information flow of the organization or of a particular industry. An EJB allows application programs to be independent of the business logic, so that when the business logic changes, the application need not change. Thus, a developer is able to focus on developing code for a client application that utilizes the business data stored in the database, rather than worrying about endless amounts of programming and coding needed to connect all the working parts for accessing the database,
  • [0083]
    An example of an EJB representing a real-world object (e.g., a customer of an enterprise) is depicted in FIG. 37. Each record in the Customer Table 3705 found in the database 3710 is accessible by the example Customer EJB 3715 via the attribute fields 3720 of the Customer Table 3705 (i.e., “ID”, “Name”, “Social Security Number”, and “Age” are shown) that are mapped to attributes 3725 in the code corresponding to the EJB. Assuming the Client Application 3730 needs to determine whether the person named “Jones” qualifies for a senior citizen discount on a purchase order, the Customer EJB 3715 may be invoked to answer the question by performing the necessary business logic operation which may involve ascertaining the “age” for “Jones” from the Customer Table 3705 and determining if the “age” for “Jones” is over 50 before reporting back the answer to the Client Application 3730.
  • [0084]
    As shown in the above example, an EJB (i.e., an EJB EntityBean) may represent a real-world object, such as a customer, a bank account, or a cruise ship, which has persistent records (i.e., data structures) in a database. An EJB (i.e., an EJB SessionBean) may also represent a set of processes or tasks, which are performed on behalf of a client application. Thus, an EJB is a distributed computing component, where a distributed computing component is a software component that runs on a computer and is designed to perform business logic for client application(s) requiring a solution to a business problem (e.g., process a customer order or determine a senior citizen discount for a customer). The solution to the business problem typically requires access to corresponding business data contained in an enterprise database. As discribed below, the software development tool supports relating a distributed computing component, such as an EJB, to a database table or data structure.
  • [0085]
    By allowing a developer to generate or update an EJB from an existing data structure in a database, the software development tool saves the developer development time as the programmer no longer has to use one tool to query the database for the composition of the data structure and another tool to create the EJB with attributes and methods (i.e., business logic operations) that map to the database in order to allow access to the data structure after the EJB is deployed. Similarly, the software development tool saves a developer time that would be spent creating a data structure that maps to code corresponding to a previously developed EJB by allowing the developer to form or update a data structure from the EJB. Thus, the software development tool relates a data structure to an object-oriented element, such as a persistent class or an EJB, so that code corresponding to the object-oriented element correlates to the data structure. One skilled in the art will appreciate that other object-oriented elements may be related to a data structure in a database by the software development tool using methods and systems consistent with the present invention. However, for clarity in the detailed description below, the methods and systems consistent with the present invention are discussed in reference to a persistent class and an EJB. An EJB is more clearly described in the following references that are incorporated herein by reference: (1) Richard Monson-Haefel, Enterprise JavaBeans,™. 2.sup.nd Edition, O'Reilly & Associates (2000); and (2) Sun Microsystems' Enterprise JavaBeans.™. Specification v1.0, v1.1, and v2.0, available at http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/docs.html.
  • [0086]
    Turning to FIG. 20, a data processing system 2000 is depicted that is suitable for practicing methods and systems consistent with the present invention, including relating an object-oriented element to a data structure in a database that contains business data. Data processing system 2000 includes a computer 2002 and a database server system 2004 that are connected via network 2006. The network 2006 may be any known physical or wireless link capable of supporting a data transmission between two computer systems, such as a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN), Internet or leased phone lines.
  • [0087]
    Computer 2002 includes the software development tool 610. The database server system 2004 includes a memory 2008, a secondary storage device 2010, an I/O device 2012, and a processor 2014. The secondary storage device 2010 includes a database 2016 that contains data structures which hold business data used in distributed computing. Memory 2008 includes a database management system 2018 that enables a requester, such as a developer using the software development tool 610, to store, modify, and extract information from the database 2016. The database management system 2018 may be any known database management system (DBMS) that is able to control the access to the database 2016.
  • [0088]
    In another implementation, the secondary storage device 2003 of the computer 2002 includes the database 2016 and the memory 2001 of the computer 2002 includes the database management system 2018. In this implementation, the software development tool 610 accesses the database 2016 without communicating via network 2006 to database server system 2004.
  • [0089]
    FIGS. 21A-C depict a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary process performed by the software development tool 610 for generating source code for an object-oriented element from a data structure in a database. To form an object-oriented element from a data structure, the software development tool 610 receives a request to access a database (step 2102). As depicted in FIG. 22, the software development tool may receive the request to access the database via a menu selection 2202 on a user interface 2200. However, a programmer may indicate the request to the software development tool using any known programming input technique, such as a keyboard input or icon selection.
  • [0090]
    The software development tool 610 also receives access information for the database (step 2104). FIG. 23 depicts an exemplary user interface displayed by the software development tool for receiving access information 2302 for the database. In this implementation, the access information 2302 includes an identification 2304 of the database management system 2018, a driver 2306 for the software development tool to use to communicate with the database 2016 via the database management system 2018, a location 2308 on the computer 2002 where the driver 2306 is stored, and a network address 2310 or URL for the database 2016 on the database server system 2004. The identified database management system 2304 maybe any known DBMS server type, such as Oracle 7.3x/8x, ODBC/Access 97, Cloudscape, ODBC/MS SQL Server, and IBM DB2 6.1. The driver 2306 may be any known driver or interface program that is suitable for communicating with the identified database management system 2304. In the exemplary implementation shown in FIG. 24, the software development tool 610 displays a default network address 2310 that a developer can change by providing a new address prefix 2312 corresponding to the identified database management system 2306, a new host name 2414 that identifies a system platform where the database management system 2018 and the database 2016 reside (e.g., local host corresponds to the computer 2002), a port 2316 assigned to the identified database management system 2304 for network communication, and a database identification 2318. As known to one skilled in the art, a commercially available DBMS may control a number of different databases. Thus, in this implementation where the identified database management system 2304 is a DBMS, the database identification 2318 names the database to be accessed via the identified database management system 2304.
  • [0091]
    Returning to FIG. 21A, after receiving access information for the database, the software development tool 610 determines if authorization is required to access the database 2016 (step 2106). The software development tool 610 determines if authorization is required based on the identification of the database management system 2304 or by querying the database management system 2304. If authorization is required, the software development tool receives an access privilege from a user (step 2108). As shown in FIG. 23, the access privilege received by the software development tool may include a user name 2322 and a password 2324, and then determines whether the access privilege 2320 is authorized (step 2110). The software development tool determines if the received access privilege is authorized by performing known authentication methods, such as querying the identified database management system to authenticate access or querying the computer 2004 where the database management system resides to authenticate access based on a respective user access profile (not shown in figures).
  • [0092]
    If access is authorized or authorization is not required, the software development tool determines whether the database contains any data structure which the programmer may select (step 2112). To determine if the database contains a data structure, the software development tool may query the database for an identification of each data structure within the database 2016. In another implementation, the software development tool may request that the database 2016 provide an identification of at least one data structure within the database. In either implementation, the software development tool may abort processing if the software development tool does not receive an identification of at least one data structure in the database.
  • [0093]
    If the database contains a data structure, the software development tool displays an identification of each data structure in the database (step 2114 in FIG. 21B). For example, in FIG. 24, an exemplary user interface 2400 displayed by the software development tool shows the identification of each data structure 2402 displayed by the software development tool in response to querying the database 2016. Next, the software development tool 610 receives an identification of a selected data structure 2404 (step 2116). As shown in FIG. 24, the software development tool may receive an identification of a selected data structure 2404 via any known programming input technique, such as a mouse click on one of the displayed data structures 2402. In one implementation, the software development tool allows the programmer to select multiple data structures to be accessed by the software development tool in order to form multiple object-oriented elements as discussed below.
  • [0094]
    Next, the software development tool receives an indication of a type of object-oriented element to form from the selected data structure (step 2118). As illustrated in FIG. 25, the type of object-oriented element 2502 may be any object-oriented element that has source code with persistent attributes mapped to the data structure in the database, such as a persistent class 2504 or an Enterprise JavaBean.™, 2506. As previously discussed, a persistent attribute has a state that is maintained between calls to operations within code corresponding to the respective object-oriented element.
  • [0095]
    The software development tool accesses a portion of the selected data structure from the database (step 2120). In one implementation, the software development tool 610 accesses a portion of the selected data structure using access information 2302 to query the database in order to receive all the attribute fields in the data structure for forming the object-oriented element. In another implementation, the software development tool may receive the entire data structure. The query is formed by the software development tool to be recognizable to the database management system 2018 that functions as a DBMS in this instance. As known to one skilled in the art, a DBMS retrieves information from a respective database based on a query that corresponds to a known, recognizable command to the DBMS.
  • [0096]
    Based on the indication of the type of object-oriented element to form, the software development tool determines whether the type of object-oriented element is a class (step 2122). In one implementation shown in FIG. 26, if the type of object-oriented element is a class, the software development tool generates source code for a class 2602 having a name 2604 that corresponds to the selected data structure 2404 (step 2124). As discussed below, if the software development tool is later instructed to update the class 2602, the identification of the data structure to access may be obtained by the software development tool from the name of the class 2602. When forming the class 2602, the software development tool generates new code for the class 2602 that includes an attribute 2606 that is related to an attribute field in the portion of the selected data structure 2404 (step 2126). Thus, the software development tool saves a developer time and effort by providing a class that has attributes that mirror the data structure so that the developer can add new methods or code specifically for referencing the data structure.
  • [0097]
    The software development tool also places the identification of the selected data structure in a comment of the source code for the class (step 2128). Therefore, in the event that the selected data structure 2404 is modified or the class is modified, the software development tool is still able to relate the data structure to the class and update one to the other as explained below. In addition, the software development tool associates the access information with the source code of the class (step 2130). By associating the access information with the source code of the class, the software development tool enables the data structure to be accessed again without prompting a developer for the access information. In one implementation, the software development tool may associate the access information with the source by storing the access information with the identification of the selected data structure in a configuration file. In this implementation, the configuration file may be stored anywhere in the project. In another implementation, the software development tool may associate the access information with the source code by storing the access information with the identification of the data structure as a comment in the source code of the class 2602. In either implementation, the software development tool is able to identify the access information based on the identification of the selected data structure 2404. Having generated the source code of the class to correspond to the selected data structure, the software development tool displays a graphical representation of the source code of the class (step 2132). As shown in FIG. 26, the software development tool graphically represents source code corresponding to the class 2602 in the diagram 2608.
  • [0098]
    If the type of object-oriented element is not a class, the software development tool determines whether the type of object-oriented element is an EJB (step 2134). If the type of object-oriented element is an EJB, the software development tool generates source code for the EJB that has a name that corresponds to the selected data structure (step 2136). In FIG. 27, the software development tool displays a portion of the source code for the EJB 2702 in the textual pane 2706. The source code for the EJB in its entirety as generated by the software development tool is shown in FIG. 28. As illustrated in FIGS. 27 and 28, the software development tool generates source code 2702 that has a name 2704 “DEPARTMENTBean” which corresponds to the selected data structure 2404, “DEPARTMENT,” shown in FIG. 24.
  • [0099]
    The software development tool also generates new code for the EJB that includes an attribute that is related to an attribute field in the portion of the selected data structure (step 2138). As shown in FIG. 27, the software development tool generates an attribute 2708 in code 2702 corresponding to the displayed EJB 2712 that is related to an attribute field in the portion of the selected data structure 2404. In addition, the software development tool generates other new code for the RIB that includes a method that accesses the related attribute field in the portion of the selected data structure (step 2140). As illustrated in FIG. 27, the software development tool generates other new code for the EJB that includes a method 2710 (“getDepartment_ID( ) long”) that accesses the related attribute field in the portion of the selected data structure 2404. Thus, the software development tool again saves a developer time and effort by providing an EJB that has attributes that mirror the attribute fields of the selected data structure and that has methods that access the attributes. The developer can then add other code specifically for referencing the data structure and using business related information contained therein to perform a specific function, such as remotely accessing a car parts inventory and generating an automated order to re-supply a customer when certain parts are found to be low.
  • [0100]
    The software development tool also adds the identification associated with the selected data structure as a comment in the source code for the EJB (step 2142). The software development tool then associates the access information with the source code of the class (step 2144). In performing these steps, the software development tool enables the data structure to be accessed again without prompting a developer for the selected data structure or access information. The software development tool may associate the access information with the source by storing the access information with the identification of the selected data structure in a configuration file. In another implementation, the software development tool may associate the access information with the source code by storing the access information with the identification of the data structure as a comment 2804 in the source code of the EJB. Having generated the source code of the EJB to correspond to the selected data structure, the software development tool displays a graphical representation of the source code of the EJB (step 2146). As shown in FIG. 27, the software development tool graphically represents source code corresponding to the EJB 2702, 2802 in the diagram 2712.
  • [0101]
    Once source code is generated from a data structure, the software development tool is able to update the source code to match the current state of a related data structure without losing any code. In FIGS. 29A-B, a flow diagram is shown that illustrates an exemplary process performed by the software development tool for updating an object-oriented element from a related data structure. The software development tool receives an indication of an object-oriented element (step 2902) and receives an indication to update the object-oriented element (step 2904). Turning to FIG. 30, in one implementation, the indication of the object-oriented element is the last element selected on the textual pane 3002. In another implementation, the object-oriented element may be any object-oriented element in the project that is related to a data structure or that has been previously formed from a data structure.
  • [0102]
    To update the source code of the object-oriented, the software development tool retrieves the identification of the data structure that is related to the object-oriented element (step 2906). In one implementation, to retrieve the identification of the data structure, the software development tool searches a source code file associated with the object-oriented element for the identification of the data structure. In this implementation, the software development tool is able to check comment fields within the source code of the object-oriented element for a predefined delimiter that identifies the data structure that is related to the object-oriented element. In another implementation, the software development tool may associate the name of the source code or object-oriented element with the identification of the data structure.
  • [0103]
    Next, the software development tool also retrieves access information for a database that stores the selected data structure (step 2908). In one implementation, the access information is stored in association with the identification of the data structure in a configuration file for the project. In another implementation, the access information is stored in association with the identification of the data structure in the source code of the object-oriented element. In either implementation, the software development tool is able to locate the access information based on the retrieved identification of the data structure.
  • [0104]
    After retrieving the access information for the database, the software development tool retrieves a portion of the data structure by accessing the database using the retrieved access information (step 2910). The portion retrieved by the software development tool includes each attribute field in the data structure. By retrieving each attribute field in the data structure, the software development tool is able to update the object-oriented element by removing an attribute that has been added to the data structure since the object-oriented element was formed from the data structure. In addition, the software development tool is able to update the object-oriented element by adding an attribute that corresponds to an attribute field added to the data structure since the object-oriented element was formed.
  • [0105]
    To update the object-oriented element to reflect a deletion to the data structure, the software development tool 610 determines whether each attribute in the object-oriented element has been checked (step 2912). If each attribute in the object-oriented element has not been checked, the software development tool selects the next attribute, starting with the first attribute (step 2913). The software development tool then determines whether the next attribute in the object-oriented element is associated with an attribute field in the data structure (step 2914). If the next attribute in the object-oriented element is not associated with the attribute field from the data structure, the software development tool removes the next attribute from the source code of the object-oriented element (step 2916). In one implementation, the software development tool removes the next attribute and a method that accesses the next attribute.
  • [0106]
    As part of updating the object-oriented element to reflect an addition to the data structure, the software development tool determines whether each attribute in the data structure has been checked (step 2918). If each attribute in the object-oriented element has not been checked, the software development tool selects the next attribute field, starting with the first attribute field (step 2919). The software development tool then determines whether the next attribute field in the data structure is associated with an attribute in the source code of the object-oriented element (step 2920). If the next attribute field in the data structure is not associated with an attribute in the source code of the object-oriented element, the software development tool adds the attribute to the source code of the object-oriented element (step 2922).
  • [0107]
    The software development tool then displays a graphical representation of the object-oriented element to reflect the update to the data structure (step 2924). For example, in FIG. 30 a user interface 3000 is displayed by the software development tool in response to the updating of source code 2802 associated with the EJB (graphically depicted as 2712 in FIG. 27) to the data structure “DEPARTMENT.” The data structure “DEPARTMENT” had previously been used to form the EJB 2712 as illustrated in FIG. 27. In response to the indication to update the object-oriented element, the software development tool removes the first attribute 2714, “public String NAME” (depicted in FIG. 27), and adds the second attribute 3004, “public int NAME” (depicted in FIG. 30), to the source code of the EJB. Hence, changing the attribute field “NAME” in the data structure causes the development tool to update the source code to reflect the change. The diagram 3006 (i.e., the graphical representation of the source code for the EJB) reflects the deletion of the first attibute 2714 and the addition of the second attribute 3404. Thus, when an attribute field of the data structure is eliminated or added by a developer after the EJB is formed from the data structure, the software development tool is able to quickly update the EJB to the data structure to resynchronize attributes of the data structure to the EJB. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the software development tool may perform the process in FIGS. 29A-B for other object-oriented elements, such as a persistent class.
  • [0108]
    FIGS. 31A-B depicts a flow diagram illustrating an exemplary process performed by the software development tool for forming a data structure used in distributed computing from source code of an object-oriented element. To form the data structure, the software development tool receives a request to form a new data structure in a database (step 3102). The type of data structure to be formed may correspond to any known data structure used for distributed computing, such as a table in a database. As shown in FIG. 32, the software development tool may receive the request from a programmer via any known programming input technique, such as a keyboard input or a menu selection 3202 on a user interface 3200. In the example illustrated in FIG. 32, when menu Selection 3602 is received, the software development tool receives the indication that the type of data structure to form is a Data Description Language (DDL) file. The Data Description Language is a known language recognized by a known DBMS for describing a table in a database. The DDL file may be transmitted by the software development tool to the DBMS 2018 generate a table in the database 2016.
  • [0109]
    The software development tool also receives an indication of an object-oriented element to use to form the data structure in the database (step 3104). In one implementation shown in FIG. 33, the programmer may indicate to the software development tool that the object-oriented element is an EJB 3302 or a persistent class 3304 that has a name 3306 depicted graphically in a diagram on the graphical pane 3308. In another implementation, the software development tool may receive the indication that the last selected object-oriented element (e.g., the EJB graphically depicted as 3310) on the graphical pane 3308 is to be used to form the data structure in the database.
  • [0110]
    The software development tool also receives access information for the database (step 3106). In one implementation shown in FIG. 34, the software development tool receives access information 3402 for the database, where access information includes an identification 3404 of the database management system 2018, a driver 3406 for the software development tool to use to communicate with the database 2016 via the database management system 2018, and a network address 2308 (i.e., URL) for the database 2016 on the database server system 2004.
  • [0111]
    Returning to FIG. 31A, after receiving the access information for the database, the software development tool determines if authorization is required to access the database 2016 (step 3108). The software development tool determines if authorization is required based on the identification of the database management system 3404 or by querying the database management system 3404. If authorization is required, the software development tool receives an access privilege 3410 (step 3110), and then determines whether the access privilege 3410 is authorized (step 3112).
  • [0112]
    Once the source code of the object-oriented element is identified, the software development tool generates an attribute field in the data structure from an attribute in the object-oriented element (step 3114 in FIG. 31B). If the object-oriented element is an EJB, the software development tool generates an attribute field from an attribute that is accessed by a method or operation in the source of the object-oriented element. In one implementation, the software development tool receives an indication 3412 to generate the attribute field in the data structure by accessing the database 2016 via the DBMS 2018 and requesting the formation of the data structure with the attribute field. In another implementation shown in FIG. 35, the software development tool receives an indication 3412 to store the data structure in a file 3502, such as a Data Definition Language (DDL) file, so that an administrator with the authority to access and modify the database 2016 is able to form the data structure in the database 2016 at a later time.
  • [0113]
    The software development tool stores an identification of the data structure with the source code of the object-oriented element (step 3116). By storing the identification of the data structure with the source code of the object-oriented element, the software development tool is able to easily identify the data structure to update the data structure from the source code of the associated object-oriented element. The software development tool also stores the access information with the identification of the data structure in association with the source code of the object-oriented element (step 3118). In one implementation, the identification of the data structure is stored with the access information in a configuration file. In another implementation, the identification of the data structure is stored with the access information as a comment in the source code of the object-oriented element.
  • [0114]
    When the data structure is formed from an object-oriented element, the software development tool is able to update the data structure to match the current state of a related object-oriented element without corrupting the remainder of the data structure. In FIGS. 36A-B, a flow diagram is shown that illustrates an exemplary process performed by the software development tool for updating a related data structure from source code of an object-oriented element. The software development tool first receives an indication of a data structure (step 3602). The software development tool also receives an indication to update the data structure (step 3604). The software development tool then retrieves an identification of an object-oriented element that is related to the data structure (step 3606). In one implementation, the software development tool is able to search the source code of each object-oriented element in the project for the identification of the data structure. The identification of the data structure may be stored as the name of the object-oriented element. In another implementation, the identification of the data structure may be stored as a comment in the source code of the object-oriented element.
  • [0115]
    Next, the software development tool retrieves access information for a database that contains the data structure (step 3608). The software development tool may retrieve the access information from a configuration file where it is stored in association with the identification of the data structure. In another embodiment, the software development tool may retrieve the access information with the identification of the data structure from a comment in the source code of the object-oriented element.
  • [0116]
    The software development tool retrieves a portion of the data structure by accessing the database using the retrieved access information (step 3610). The portion retrieved by the software development tool includes each attribute field in the data structure. By retrieving each attribute field in the data structure, the software development tool is able to update the data structure by removing an attribute field that has been removed from the source code of the object-oriented element since the data structure was formed. In addition, the software development tool is able to update the data structure by adding an attribute that corresponds to an attribute field added to the data structure since the object-oriented element was formed.
  • [0117]
    To update the data structure to reflect a deletion to the object-oriented element, the software development tool determines whether each attribute field in the data structure has been checked (step 3612 in FIG. 36B). If each attribute field in the data structure element has not been checked, the software development tool selects the next attribute field, starting with the first attribute field (step 3613). The software development tool then determines whether the next attribute field in the data structure is associated with an attribute in the source code of the object-oriented element (step 3614). If the next attribute field in the data structure is not associated with an attribute in the source code of the object-oriented element, the software development tool removes the next attribute field from the data structure (step 3616).
  • [0118]
    To update the data structure to reflect an addition to source code of the object-oriented element, the software development tool determines whether each attribute in the object-oriented element has been checked (step 3618). If each attribute in the object-oriented element has not been checked, the software development tool selects the next attribute, starting with the first attribute (step 3619). If each attribute in the object-oriented element has not been checked, the software development tool determines whether an attribute in the object-oriented element is associated with an attribute field in the data structure (step 3820). The software development tool then adds the attribute field to the data structure (step 3622).
  • [0119]
    While various embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible that are within the scope of this invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
Citações de patente
Citada Data de depósito Data de publicação Requerente Título
US5175856 *23 ago. 199029 dez. 1992Supercomputer Systems Limited PartnershipComputer with integrated hierarchical representation (ihr) of program wherein ihr file is available for debugging and optimizing during target execution
US5499371 *22 mar. 199512 mar. 1996Persistence Software, Inc.Method and apparatus for automatic generation of object oriented code for mapping relational data to objects
US5642513 *26 set. 199624 jun. 1997Eastman Kodak CompanyMethod and apparatus for multiple autorouter rule language
US5819086 *7 jun. 19956 out. 1998Wall Data IncorporatedComputer system for creating semantic object models from existing relational database schemas
US5826087 *2 out. 199520 out. 1998Lohmann; William C.Method and apparatus for cross calling programs of different lexical scoping methodology
US5829006 *6 jun. 199527 out. 1998International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for efficient relational query generation and tuple-to-object translation in an object-relational gateway supporting class inheritance
US5848273 *27 out. 19958 dez. 1998Unisys Corp.Method for generating OLE automation and IDL interfaces from metadata information
US5872977 *8 ago. 199716 fev. 1999International Business Machines CorporationObject-oriented method and apparatus for creating a makefile
US5937402 *19 jun. 199710 ago. 1999Ontos, Inc.System for enabling access to a relational database from an object oriented program
US5956725 *26 nov. 199721 set. 1999Interanational Business Machines CorporationSchema mapping to a legacy table with primary and foreign key support
US5963724 *16 fev. 19965 out. 1999Analogy, Inc.Component-based analog and mixed-signal simulation model development
US5966126 *23 dez. 199612 out. 1999Szabo; Andrew J.Graphic user interface for database system
US6028997 *30 maio 199722 fev. 2000International Business Machines CorporationMethod of generating an implementation of reusable parts from containers of a workflow process-model
US6041180 *28 abr. 199721 mar. 2000International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for optimizing template object files
US6044217 *23 out. 199728 mar. 2000International Business Machines CorporationHierarchical metadata store for an integrated development environment
US6141660 *16 jul. 199831 out. 2000International Business Machines CorporationCommand line interface for creating business objects for accessing a hierarchical database
US6145117 *30 jan. 19987 nov. 2000Tera Systems IncorporatedCreating optimized physical implementations from high-level descriptions of electronic design using placement based information
US6175837 *29 jun. 199816 jan. 2001Sun Microsystems, Inc.Object-relational mapping toll that processes views
US6182142 *10 jul. 199830 jan. 2001Encommerce, Inc.Distributed access management of information resources
US6199195 *8 jul. 19996 mar. 2001Science Application International CorporationAutomatically generated objects within extensible object frameworks and links to enterprise resources
US6209124 *30 ago. 199927 mar. 2001Touchnet Information Systems, Inc.Method of markup language accessing of host systems and data using a constructed intermediary
US6247020 *17 dez. 199712 jun. 2001Borland Software CorporationDevelopment system with application browser user interface
US6269475 *2 jun. 199831 jul. 2001Webgain, Inc.Interface for object oriented programming language
US6289344 *11 maio 199811 set. 2001International Business Machines CorporationContext-sensitive authorization in an RDBMS
US6487713 *24 set. 199926 nov. 2002Phoenix Technologies Ltd.Software development system that presents a logical view of project components, facilitates their selection, and signals missing links prior to compilation
US6738975 *5 out. 199918 maio 2004Software Ag, Inc.Extensible distributed enterprise application integration system
US6742175 *27 nov. 200025 maio 2004Codagen Technologies Corp.Component-based source code generator
US6850950 *11 fev. 20001 fev. 2005Pitney Bowes Inc.Method facilitating data stream parsing for use with electronic commerce
US6901579 *11 abr. 199731 maio 2005Fujitsu LimitedGeneration of source code from classes and maintaining the comment that indicates the role of the class in the generated source code
US7155705 *26 nov. 200126 dez. 2006Cisco Technology, Inc.Techniques for binding an application with a data exchange format based on tags in comments
US7233940 *5 nov. 200119 jun. 2007Answers CorporationSystem for processing at least partially structured data
US7316003 *18 dez. 20021 jan. 2008Oracle International Corp.System and method for developing a dynamic web page
US20020108101 *20 abr. 20018 ago. 2002Dietrich CharisiusMethods and systems for relating a data definition file and a data model for distributed computing
US20020178394 *5 nov. 200128 nov. 2002Naama BambergerSystem for processing at least partially structured data
US20020184610 *18 jan. 20025 dez. 2002Kelvin ChongSystem and method for building multi-modal and multi-channel applications
US20040230955 *23 fev. 200418 nov. 2004Bea Systems, Inc.System for multi-language debugging
US20080010629 *30 nov. 200410 jan. 2008International Business Machines CorporationShareable, bidirectional mechanism for conversion between object model and XML
US20130104100 *21 out. 201125 abr. 2013Sap AgScripting Language for Business Applications
Citações de não patente
Referência
1 *G. Hedin "Supporting Programming Convetnions", 1996, pp.1-7, available at as of 6/27/13.
Citada por
Citação Data de depósito Data de publicação Requerente Título
US8914778 *5 nov. 201216 dez. 2014International Business Machines CorporationData placement for execution of an executable
US8914779 *26 nov. 201216 dez. 2014International Business Machines CorporationData placement for execution of an executable
US893092120 nov. 20126 jan. 2015International Business Machines CorporationCompilation and placement of instructions in a memory system
Classificações
Classificação nos Estados Unidos717/108
Classificação internacionalG06F9/44
Classificação cooperativaG06F8/20, G06F8/36, G06F8/75, G06F8/34, G06F8/35, G06F8/71
Classificação europeiaG06F8/20, G06F8/34, G06F8/35, G06F8/75, G06F8/36, G06F8/71
Eventos legais
DataCódigoEventoDescrição
13 maio 2015ASAssignment
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MICRO FOCUS (US), INC.;BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION;ATTACHMATE CORPORATION;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:035656/0251
Effective date: 20141120
2 maio 2017ASAssignment
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR AGENT, NEW
Free format text: NOTICE OF SUCCESSION OF AGENCY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS PRIOR AGENT;REEL/FRAME:042388/0386
Effective date: 20170501