|Número da publicação||US5133075 A|
|Tipo de publicação||Concessão|
|Número do pedido||US 07/286,556|
|Data de publicação||21 jul. 1992|
|Data de depósito||19 dez. 1988|
|Data da prioridade||19 dez. 1988|
|Status da taxa||Sem validade|
|Também publicado como||CA2001972A1, DE68928195D1, DE68928195T2, EP0374512A2, EP0374512A3, EP0374512B1, US5471629|
|Número da publicação||07286556, 286556, US 5133075 A, US 5133075A, US-A-5133075, US5133075 A, US5133075A|
|Inventores||Tore J. M. Risch|
|Cessionário original||Hewlett-Packard Company|
|Exportar citação||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citações de patente (8), Citada por (456), Classificações (10), Eventos legais (5)|
|Links externos: USPTO, Cessão do USPTO, Espacenet|
The present invention relates generally to database systems, and more particularly to a method of monitoring changes in values of attributes of objects in object-oriented database systems.
In an object-oriented database system, an "object" is a kind of entity. An object has certain "attributes", or characteristics, associated with it. A "view" of an object is a set of some of the attributes associated with that object. To "materialize" a certain view respecting a given object means to provide the values of those attributes which make up that view.
Some attributes have values which are stored in the database; these attributes are accessed by retrieving them from storage. An "extensional" function is a procedure which is used for retrieving such values from storage. Other attributes have values which are not stored but rather are derived (by computation or the like) as needed; an "intensional" function is a procedure which is used for deriving such values (and which has no undesired side effects).
For example, an employer might have a database system for keeping certain information about its employees. Each employee would be known to the database system as an "object" of type EMPLOYEE. The database might include values for each of the following attributes of an EMPLOYEE object:
DATE OF BIRTH
(In addition, the system gives each employee a unique identifier so that two employees having the same name can easily be distinguished.)
As already noted, some attributes can be derived from others. For example, every employee has an AGE, but if the system knows an employee's birthdate it can easily compute that employee's age. Therefore, to save space and to preserve system integrity only the value of the employee's birthdate is stored in the database; the employee's age is computed whenever it is needed.
An employee named Bill Johnson might be represented by the following attribute values in the database:
______________________________________NAME: Bill JohnsonBIRTH DATE: 4-5-60HOME ADDRESS: 123 Main Street, Palo Alto, CA 94303MONTHLY SALARY: $2,500.00HIRE DATE: 11-20-85______________________________________
One "view" of an employee might consist only of the employee's name and address. Such a view might be used, for example, to have the computer print an envelope in which a notice to employees would be mailed. To "materialize" this view for a given employee it would be necessary to call two extensional functions--"Name" and "Address"--which would return the values of the attributes NAME and ADDRESS of the designated employee.
Another view of an employee might consist of the employee's name, age, monthly salary and number of years with the company. This view might be used, for example, to calculate how much to credit to the employee's retirement account. To materialize this view it would be necessary to call two extensional functions--"Name" and "Monthly Salary"--and two intensional functions--"Age" and "Number of Years with Company." The two intensional functions would return the required values of the attributes AGE and NUMBER OF YEARS WITH COMPANY by performing computations on other values returned by extensional or other intensional functions and which ultimately are derived from values which are stored in the database.
A typical computer system includes a central processing unit, a main memory, storage media such as magnetic disks, a terminal which includes for example a keyboard and a monitor screen, and a plurality of workstations. Each workstation comprises a terminal and usually a local processing unit and memory as well. Users at the various workstations use the computer to perform a variety of tasks.
A "client" of a database system is an applications program which interacts with the database system. Such a client program may be executed by the central processor or by a local processing unit in a workstation. A user may be running a plurality of client programs simultaneously.
Occasions may arise when a client needs to be alerted if certain values in the database are changed. In the example of the employee database discussed above, at one workstation a client program might be updating the database with respect to various financial matters, including the amount to deposit in each employee's retirement account for the previous month, while at a different workstation (possibly hundreds of miles away) another client program might be updating the database by posting all the salary raises which were granted during that month. The first client program must be alerted if anything done by either program results in changes in the values of financial data respecting one of the employees on whose retirement account the first client is then working.
More generally, a notification that a monitored value has changed may be needed for any of a number of purposes. A client may wish to be alerted if an abnormal condition occurs. The occurrence of a certain condition or set of conditions may be a signal to start running a certain application program. A graphic display may need to be updated whenever there is a change in a parameter being displayed. A client may need to recompute certain other values which depend on the value which has just changed (as in the above example of the employee retirement account).
Monitoring imposes a heavy computational and input/output overhead on a database system, especially if the system is large and a number of values are being monitored at the same time for several different clients. Various methods have been proposed to minimize this overhead. For example, in one such system an "alerter" is called if specified boolean conditions are satisfied (O. P. Buneman and E. K. Clemons, "Efficiently Monitoring Relational Databases," ACM Transactions on Database Systems 4, 3, September 1979, pp 368-382). A "retrieve always" mechanism in another system causes queries to be re-executed upon each update to specified relations (M. Stonebraker, "Triggers and Inference in Database Systems," in M. Brodie and J. Mylopoulos (eds.), On Knowledge Based Management Systems, Springer-Verlag, 1986).
Systems of "triggers" have been proposed for relational database systems; such triggers typically invoke a database procedure upon updates of user-specified base relations (see, for example, M. Astrahan et al., "System R: A Relational Approach to Database Management," ACM TRansactions on Database Systems, 1 (2), June 1976).
A technique which is somewhat similar to the trigger system is the use of a "declarative integrity constraint," in which a proffered update to the database is rejected if specified boolean conditions are not satisfied at commit time (see, for example, M. Stonebraker, "Implementation of Integrity Constraints and Views by Query Modification," Proc. ACM SIGMOD Conf., San Jose, Calif., May 1975).
Another technique, access-oriented programming, is implemented in some object-oriented languages such as "LOOPS". A message to set values of instance variables is intercepted by means of a user-provided trigger procedure which may in turn set or display some other value (M. J. Stefik et al., "Integrating Access-Oriented Programming Into a Multiparadigm Environment," IEEE Software 3, 10, January 1986, pp. 10-18). The trigger procedures are dynamically added and removed from running systems to avoid interfering with other system logic (K. Osterbye, "Active Objects: An Access Oriented Framework for Object-Oriented Languages," Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, Vol. 1, No. 2, June/July 1988, pp. 6-10).
Finally, expert systems such as "SYNTEL" and "OPS5" provide a method of monitoring virtual memory data retrieved from persistent data (R. Reboh and T. Risch, "Syntel: Knowledge Programming Using Functional Representations," Proc. AAAI-86, Philadelphia, Pa., August 1986, pub. Morgan Kaufman, Los Altos, Calif., 1986, pp. 1003-1007).
Each of these proposed methods offers certain benefits, primarily in the context of the particular environment for which it was designed. However, there remains a need for an efficient way to monitor objects in an object-oriented database system which interacts cooperatively with client programs.
The present invention provides a localized method of monitoring an object in an interactive, object-oriented database system in response to a request from a client program and invoking an application procedure designated by the client if a change in a monitored attribute value is detected. High-overhead tasks are performed at times when monitoring is not taking place so as to minimize any overhead imposed on the system during actual monitoring.
A preferred embodiment of a method of monitoring an object according to the invention includes the following steps: keeping a record of any client requests to monitor an attribute of the object; keeping a record of any update transactions initiated by a client during an update session; and if that client requests that the transaction be committed, determining which monitored attributes may have been affected, determining whether the values of any of said attributes have changed, and, for each value which has changed, notifying any client which requested monitoring of that attribute.
Notifying a client preferably comprises interrupting any task then being performed by the client and invoking a predesignated client procedure. If the client is not in an interruptible state, a record is kept of notifications intended for that client until the client enters an interruptible state or requests notification.
Monitor requests are preferably localized with respect to time, client, object and attribute to minimize the overhead imposed on the system during database updates.
Keeping the record of update transactions imposes very little overhead on the database system because the record is small and can be kept in main memory. The record can be cleared after determining whether the values of any attributes have changed. This determination may be made when updates are committed or any time a client requests notification of any changes. In the latter event, a record of the changes is preferably kept for later notification of other clients for which attributes are being monitored.
Certain high-overhead tasks can be performed before an update session is commenced. One such task consists of optimizing a partial view materialization path for each attribute of a view of an object. This task is preferably carried out during creation of the view itself. Later, if monitoring of the value of an attribute of that view is requested, the optimized path for that attribute is used, thereby imposing less overhead on the system than would be imposed if the entire view had to be materialized in order to monitor the value of that one attribute.
Another task which is preferably taken care of ahead of time is defining a monitor procedure for a given attribute. This task includes, for example, creating means for keeping the record of client requests for monitoring of that attribute and creating means for keeping a record of the value of the attribute being monitored.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the invention.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating a procedure for keeping a record of monitor requests according to the invention;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating a procedure for an update session according to the invention;
FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a "Check Monitors" procedure which is called from the procedure shown in FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating a view creation procedure according to the invention;
FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating a monitor definition procedure according to the invention;
FIG. 6A and 6B are a time line chart of a database session including object monitoring according to the method of the invention;
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a computer system which includes an object-oriented database system including monitoring according to the invention; and
FIG. 8 is a block diagram of communication flow among portions of the system shown in FIG. 7.
As shown in the drawings for purposes of illustration, the invention is embodied in a novel method of monitoring a database object and notifying a client program if a change is detected. Various methods of monitoring data in databases have been proposed, but there has been a need for an efficient way to monitor an attribute of an object in an interactive, object-oriented database system.
A method of monitoring a database object according to the invention includes keeping a record of any client request to monitor an attribute of the object, keeping a record of update transactions, and notifying the requesting client of any change in the value of the monitored attribute by invoking a predetermined client procedure when the update transactions are committed. The invention thus provides an efficient means for client programs to initiate monitor requests and receive notifications of changes in monitored attributes of database objects while imposing only minimal overhead on the database system.
In a preferred embodiment, a method of monitoring an object in a database in response to a request from any of a plurality of client programs comprises keeping a record of any client requests to monitor an attribute of the object; during a database update session, keeping a record of any database update transactions initiated by a client; and, if a client which has initiated an update transaction requests that the transaction be committed, determining which monitored attributes may have been affected by said transaction, determining whether the values of any of said attributes have changed, and for each value which has changed notifying any client which requested monitoring of that attribute.
The record of client requests is preferably kept by means of a "Request Monitoring" procedure as illustrated in FIG. 1. The procedure is begun (block 101) by receipt of a request from a client to monitor a certain attribute. The request is entered in a "Client Address" table (block 102) and an "Attribute Value" table (block 103), and the procedure thereupon ends (block 104). The structure of these tables will be discussed in more detail in a subsequent paragraph.
The record of database update transactions is preferably kept by creating and updating a "Function Change" table during an "Update Session" procedure as illustrated in FIG. 2. The procedure is begun (block 201) by a client initiating an update session. The system creates the Function Change table (block 202) and then proceeds with an update task as directed by the client (block 203). If the task included an extensional function update call (block 204), the function which was called is entered in the Function Change table (block 205); if not, no entry is made in the table. The client decides whether to commit any updates made thus far (block 206), and if the client requests that such updates be committed a "Check Monitors" procedure is called (block 207).
Determining which monitored attributes may have been affected and whether the values of any of those attributes have changed is preferably accomplished by means of the Check Monitors procedure as illustrated in FIG. 3. As described above, the procedure is initiated (block 301) by a procedure call generated during an update session (the procedure may also be called directly by a client as will be discussed in more detail in a subsequent paragraph). Any update function call which might have resulted in a change to a monitored attribute value is detected (block 302) by reference to the Function Change table and to a "Function Dependence" table (to be described hereafter). An updated value for each such attribute is computed (block 303). Whether there has been any change in such an attribute value is determined (block 304) by reference to the Attribute Value table. If a monitored attribute value has changed, a change notification is prepared and saved (block 305) and sent to the client which called the procedure (block 306); because the procedure was called by a commit request made by an update client, the update client is the one which receives the notification. The Function Change table is cleared (block 307) and the procedure ends (block 308).
Referring again to FIG. 2, after the Check Monitors procedure is concluded the updated data is committed to the database (block 208). ("Committing" means storing the updated data in the database and deleting any superseded data.) Then the saved change notification is sent to any other client which had requested monitoring of the changed attribute value (block 209). If there is another update task to perform (block 210), such task is performed (block 203) and the above-described steps are repeated. When there are no more update tasks to perform, the update session ends (block 211).
It will be noted that a loop is defined by blocks 203, 204, 205, 206 and 210. In the absence of a commit decision (block 206), each update task results in one pass through the loop. Except for updating the Function Change table, the loop imposes no overhead which would not be imposed in the absence of the monitor procedure. As already noted, the Function Change table is small and resides in main memory and therefore the requirement to update it imposes very little overhead; moreover, even this small amount of overhead is skipped (block 204) unless the update task being performed includes an extensional function update call. Thus, the overhead imposed during an update session is kept to a minimum.
Notifying a client preferably comprises interrupting any task then being performed by the client and invoking a predesignated client procedure, for example by sending the notification to a portion of the client program referred to as a "monitor server". If the client being notified is the one which called the Check Monitors procedure (usually this will be the client which requests that updates be committed), this is done when a change in the monitored attribute value is detected (block 309 of FIG. 3).
If the client being notified is not the client which called the Check Monitor procedure, a determination is made, for example by that client's monitor server, whether the client is in an interruptible state (block 212 of FIG. 2). If the client is in an interruptible state, the monitor server invokes the predesignated procedure (block 213). If the client is not in an interruptible state, the monitor server waits (block 214) and keeps a record of the notification either until the client enters an interruptible state at which time the monitor server interrupts the client or until the client requests notification.
When a client's monitor server interrupts a client, in addition to invoking the predesignated procedure the monitor server also processes any waiting notifications (block 215 in FIG. 2 and block 310 in FIG. 3).
Preferably, a partial view materialization path for a given attribute is created in advance of any request to monitor that attribute. This is done during a "Create View" procedure as depicted in FIG. 4. The Create View procedure is a relatively high-overhead task which is ordinarily performed during creation of the database or if necessary at other times, preferably when the system is not otherwise busy.
The Create View procedure is begun (block 401) by a user who instructs the system to create a view of an object. Various tasks are performed (block 402) by the system in creating such a view; the nature of these tasks is known to those skilled in the art and will not be further discussed herein. In addition to said tasks, the system creates and optimizes a partial view materialization path for each attribute of the view (block 403). After completing any other tasks associated with creating the view (block 404) the procedure ends (block 405).
The partial path for a given attribute constitutes a minimum number of steps needed to access only that one attribute without materializing the entire view. Later, if a request is made to monitor one of these attributes, this partial path is used to access the attribute. In the absence of such a path, it would be necessary to materialize the entire view just to access the one attribute being monitored, a step which would impose more overhead on the system than is imposed by using the partial path.
Preferably a monitor is defined for a given attribute in advance of any request to monitor that attribute. This is done by means of a "Define Monitor" procedure as illustrated in FIG. 5. As was the Create View procedure, the Define Monitor procedure is a relatively high-overhead task which is preferably carried out when the system is not otherwise busy.
The Define Monitor procedure is begun (block 501) by a user who tells the system which attribute is to be monitored. As discussed above, every attribute is accessed by a function (either an extensional function or an intensional function), and the monitor procedure which is defined for a given attribute is defined in terms of the function which accesses that attribute (this function is hereafter referred to as "the monitored function").
The Define Monitor procedure preferably includes creating means for keeping the record of client requests. More particularly, a Client Address table is created (block 502) for the monitored function. This table includes positions for recording a client's identification, a client's address (for example, a workstation location) and a name of a procedure designated by the client.
Later, when a client requests monitoring of an attribute, the client's identification, address, and procedure designation are entered in the Client Address table for the function which accesses that attribute. The information in the table tells the system which client procedure to invoke upon detecting a change in the monitored attribute and where to send the notification that the procedure is to be invoked.
The Define Monitor procedure preferably includes creating means for keeping a record of the value of the attribute being monitored. More particularly, an Attribute Value table is created (block 503) for the monitored function. This table includes positions for recording the value of the attribute accessed by the function.
Later, when monitoring is begun, the then-current value of that attribute is calculated and entered in the table. Comparison of that value with the of the monitored attribute after an update tells the system whether the monitored value was in fact changed as a result of the update.
A single Function Dependence table is used to correlate extensional functions with intensional functions. As previously indicated, an intensional function accesses an attribute value by computation or the like based on other attribute values. A change in one of these other values may result in a change in the value accessed by that intensional function. Accordingly, if an attribute which is accessed by an intensional function is being monitored, any change in any of the values which are used in accessing the monitored attribute must be detected in order to determine whether the monitored value has changed. The Function Dependence table provides this correlation.
Accordingly, during monitor definition, if the function which accesses the attribute to be monitored is an intensional function, that function is listed in the Function Dependence table together with each extensional function which could change any of the values which are utilized by that intensional function in accessing the monitored attribute. Later, when Check Monitors is called, the extensional function update calls as listed in the Function Change table are compared with the listings in the Function Dependence table. In this way, the system detects update function calls which may have resulted in changes to monitored attributes (block 302).
Finally, the Define Monitor procedure preferably includes updating a "Monitor Properties" table (block 505). This table is a housekeeping table which tells the system where to find the Client Address and Attribute Value tables associated with each monitored function. After performing this step, the Define Monitor procedure ends (block 506).
The invention as described provides for notification to be sent to each client monitoring a given attribute when a client which is updating the data base decides to commit any changes. Some clients may need to check for changes at other times. Accordingly, any client which is monitoring an attribute may call the Check Monitors procedure at any time and receive notifications respecting changes to attributes being monitored by that client. It will be apparent that any such changes will be changes which have not yet been committed to the database; accordingly, notification of such changes is not sent to any client other than the one which called the Check Monitors procedure. However, a record of such changes is kept (block 305) for later notification of other clients and the Function Change table is cleared (block 307). If there are no further changes in the monitored value, then the notifications are sent to the other clients at commit time (as indicated by blocks 209 and 215 in FIG. 2 and 310 in FIG. 3). If there are further changes, then such changes will be detected at commit time and appropriate notifications will be sent. Thus, clients other than the client which invokes the Check Monitor procedure are assured that changed data have been committed to the database at the time the clients are notified of the changes.
A typical sequence of events during a database update session which includes monitoring according to the invention is depicted in time chart form in FIGS. 6A and 6B. The term "update client" refers to a client program which initiates an update session; the term "remote client" refers to some other client which requests monitoring of an attribute during the time the update client is updating the database.
At time T1 the update client begins the update session. The database system creates a Function Change table to keep a record of any extensional function update calls initiated as a result of updates performed by the update client (see block 202 of FIG. 2).
At time T2 the update client begins issuing update commands and the system responds by performing tasks as commanded. At time T3, which may be the same as time T2 or any time thereafter, the update client requests that a certain attribute be monitored; the system adds the update client to the Client Address and Attribute Value tables (see the Request Monitoring procedure of FIG. 1). Thereafter, beginning at time T4 the update client continues updating and the system updates the Function Change table (see block 205 of FIG. 2) while it performs the tasks as commanded.
At time T5 the remote client begins using the system. If the remote client were to initiate an update session, another Function Change table would be created, but for purposes of the session depicted in FIGS. 6A and 6B it is assumed that the remote client is doing something else with the database system and therefore no Function Change table is created for that client. The system performs tasks as commanded by the remote client.
At time T6, which could be any time after T5, the remote client requests monitoring of the same attribute as the update client is monitoring; the system thereupon adds the remote client to the Client Address and Attribute Value tables. Thereafter (at time T7) the remote client continues using the system and the system performs tasks as commanded.
At time T8 the update client decides to commit whatever updates it has initiated. In response, the system checks for changes in monitored attribute values using the method of the invention as already described. If a change in the value of the attribute being monitored for the update client is detected, the update client's monitor server is notified. The monitor server interrupts the client (time T9) and invokes a procedure which the update client had designated earlier at time T3, when it first requested monitoring. The invoked procedure ends at time T10 and the system continues by clearing the Function Change table, notifying the remote client's monitor server, and committing the data.
The remote client is interrupted by its monitor server (time T11) and performs its predesignated procedure. Meanwhile, the update client resumes updating and the system again updates the Function Change table while performing tasks commanded by the update client. At time T12 the remote client finishes its procedure and at time T13 it too resumes using the system.
If there were another change in the value of the monitored attribute, the clients would again be interrupted. However, for purposes of the example it is assumed that there are no further changes and that the update client ends the update session at time T14. The system deletes the Function Change table for that client and removes the client from the Client Address and Attribute Value tables.
At time T15 the remote client ends its use of the system and it too is removed from the tables.
The example as depicted in FIGS. 6A and 6B is intended only to be illustrative of a relatively simple set of transactions. It will be apparent that a plurality of clients might be using the system at any given time and that various ones of the clients might update the database or request monitoring during various overlapping intervals of time. The various steps of the method as described and illustrated may occur many times during an update session as various monitor requests are received and various changed data are committed to the database.
An example of a computer system on which the method of the invention can be implemented is shown in FIG. 7. The system includes a central computer 701 having a central processor 702, a main memory 703, storage such as a magnetic disk drive 704, and a terminal 705, all interconnected by a bus 706. A plurality of workstations 707A and 707B, having respectively a local processor 708A and B, a memory 709A and B, storage 710A and B, and a terminal 711A and B, all interconnected by a bus 712A and B, are connected to the central computer 701 by a communications link 713. The communications link 713 may be a dedicated wire system, a telephone connection, a microwave system, or most any means by which the central computer 701 and the workstations 707A and B can communicate with each other.
An example of how communications might pass among client programs and the database system is shown in FIG. 8. For purposes of discussion all software and data are depicted as residing in main memory, but it will be apparent that in a real system some of the software and data are actually resident in mass storage and are called into main memory as needed. Also, certain communication channels are depicted as physical lines of communication but may actually exist in some other form such as instructions which pass information back and forth among different computer programs or parts of a program.
The memory 703 of the main computer 701 contains the database system (software and data) 715, a client program 717, a monitor server 719, and other programs 721. The client program 717 can issue commands to the database through a communication channel 723. The monitor server 719 can interrupt the client program and invoke a predesignated procedure through a communication channel 725. The monitor server 719 receives notifications from the database 715 through a communication channel 727.
The memory 709A of the workstation 707A contains a client program 729, a monitor server 731, and other programs 733. The client program 729 can issue commands to the database through a communication channel 735. The monitor server 731 can interrupt the client program and invoke a predesignated procedure through a communication channel 737. The monitor server 731 receives notifications from the database 715 through a communication channel 739.
The memory 709B of the workstation 707B contains two client programs 741 and 743, a monitor server 745, and other programs 747. The client programs 741 and 743 can issue commands to the database through the communication channel 735. The monitor server 745 can interrupt either or both of the client programs 741 and 743 and invoke predesignated procedures through a communication channel 749. The monitor server 745 receives notifications from the database 715 through the communication channel 739.
In the system as illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8, one or more of the client programs may be running at any given time and, as discussed in connection with the time chart of FIGS. 6A and 6B, may issue commands to the database at various times. When monitored attribute values change the database issues notifications to whichever clients have requested notification of such changes, and the respective monitor servers thereupon interrupt their respective clients and invoke whichever procedures have been predesignated by those clients. Any given workstation, or the central computer, may have zero, one or many client programs active at any given time.
High efficiency is achieved by the method of the invention in part by minimizing system overhead as described and in part by localizing any monitoring which is being done. From the preceding discussion it will be apparent that the monitoring can be localized as to time, client, object and attribute as desired.
Thus, for example, a client program can start and stop a monitor so that monitoring does not take place except during a time when the client actually requires the monitoring. A procedure for stopping a monitor has been illustrated in FIG. 6 as being utilized when a client ends a session, but it will be apparent that such a procedure, which requires only that the client be deleted from the Client Address and Attribute Value tables, could be performed upon request of a client at any time even if the client continues to use the database system.
Localizing the monitoring as to client is inherent in the method of the invention in that monitoring only takes place when requested by a client. In addition, if a client becomes inactive without instructing the system to cease monitoring, monitoring can nevertheless be stopped, for example by periodic checks run by system to find out which clients are active and which have ceased to be active.
The monitoring can be localized as to object by monitoring only attributes of specified (focused) objects rather than monitoring all objects of a given type. Finally, as already discussed the monitoring is localized as to attribute by monitoring only desired attributes, not all attributes of a given object.
From the foregoing it will be apparent that the invention provides an efficient method of monitoring objects in an interactive object-oriented database system. Client programs participate actively in the monitoring by issuing monitor requests and by interacting with the database when notified that a monitored attribute value has changed. In this manner even a large number of client programs accessing a very large database can receive prompt, efficient service.
Although certain specific embodiments of the invention have been described and illustrated, the invention is not to be limited to the specific forms or arrangements of parts so described and illustrated, and various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Within the scope of the appended claims, therefore, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described and illustrated.
|Citada||Data de depósito||Data de publicação||Requerente||Título|
|US4769772 *||28 fev. 1985||6 set. 1988||Honeywell Bull, Inc.||Automated query optimization method using both global and parallel local optimizations for materialization access planning for distributed databases|
|US4805099 *||21 mar. 1988||14 fev. 1989||Wang Laboratories, Inc.||Retrieval of related records from a relational database|
|US4819159 *||29 ago. 1986||4 abr. 1989||Tolerant Systems, Inc.||Distributed multiprocess transaction processing system and method|
|US4864497 *||13 abr. 1988||5 set. 1989||Digital Equipment Corporation||Method of integrating software application programs using an attributive data model database|
|US4918593 *||8 jan. 1987||17 abr. 1990||Wang Laboratories, Inc.||Relational database system|
|US4937743 *||10 set. 1987||26 jun. 1990||Intellimed Corporation||Method and system for scheduling, monitoring and dynamically managing resources|
|US4961139 *||30 jun. 1988||2 out. 1990||Hewlett-Packard Company||Data base management system for real-time applications|
|US4965718 *||29 set. 1988||23 out. 1990||International Business Machines Corporation||Data processing system incorporating a memory resident directive for synchronizing multiple tasks among plurality of processing elements by monitoring alternation of semaphore data|
|Citação||Data de depósito||Data de publicação||Requerente||Título|
|US5230075 *||4 jun. 1990||20 jul. 1993||General Electric Company||Database shadowing system with data tags that select an operation of the save command|
|US5241622 *||9 ago. 1991||31 ago. 1993||Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.||Slot accessing method in object-oriented expert system|
|US5261098 *||28 ago. 1991||9 nov. 1993||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for deriving object type and obtaining object type attribute values|
|US5291583 *||14 dez. 1990||1 mar. 1994||Racal-Datacom, Inc.||Automatic storage of persistent ASN.1 objects in a relational schema|
|US5295256 *||14 dez. 1990||15 mar. 1994||Racal-Datacom, Inc.||Automatic storage of persistent objects in a relational schema|
|US5315703 *||23 dez. 1992||24 maio 1994||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented notification framework system|
|US5319777 *||16 out. 1990||7 jun. 1994||Sinper Corporation||System and method for storing and retrieving information from a multidimensional array|
|US5343409 *||29 ago. 1991||30 ago. 1994||Hewlett-Packard Company||System and method for probing object resources in a window server environment|
|US5367633 *||11 jan. 1994||22 nov. 1994||Taligent, Inc.||Objected oriented notification framework system|
|US5369766 *||25 mar. 1993||29 nov. 1994||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented loader system with support for different load formats|
|US5371884 *||21 dez. 1993||6 dez. 1994||Taligent, Inc.||Processor fault recovery system|
|US5375234 *||28 jan. 1994||20 dez. 1994||International Business Machines Corporation||Data dictionary manager for maintaining an active data dictionary|
|US5379430 *||4 ago. 1993||3 jan. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented system locator system|
|US5379432 *||19 jul. 1993||3 jan. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented interface for a procedural operating system|
|US5388264 *||13 set. 1993||7 fev. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object oriented framework system for routing, editing, and synchronizing MIDI multimedia information using graphically represented connection object|
|US5390138 *||13 set. 1993||14 fev. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented audio system|
|US5390325 *||23 dez. 1992||14 fev. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Automated testing system|
|US5394523 *||22 jan. 1993||28 fev. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Polymorphic graphic device|
|US5396626 *||4 ago. 1993||7 mar. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented locator system|
|US5404529 *||19 jul. 1993||4 abr. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented interprocess communication system interface for a procedural operating system|
|US5428718 *||22 jan. 1993||27 jun. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Tessellation system|
|US5428722 *||5 nov. 1993||27 jun. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented painter maker|
|US5428744 *||30 ago. 1993||27 jun. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented system for building a graphic image on a display|
|US5432948 *||26 abr. 1993||11 jul. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented rule-based text input transliteration system|
|US5434965 *||23 dez. 1992||18 jul. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Balloon help system|
|US5446902 *||14 jul. 1993||29 ago. 1995||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Method for implementing computer applications in an object oriented manner using a traditional non-object oriented programming language|
|US5446903 *||4 maio 1993||29 ago. 1995||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for controlling access to data elements in a data processing system based on status of an industrial process by mapping user's security categories and industrial process steps|
|US5450583 *||22 jun. 1992||12 set. 1995||Fujitsu Limited||Object-oriented language processing system|
|US5455599 *||4 abr. 1995||3 out. 1995||Taligent Inc.||Object-oriented graphic system|
|US5455854 *||26 out. 1993||3 out. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented telephony system|
|US5455951 *||19 jul. 1993||3 out. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Method and apparatus for running an object-oriented program on a host computer with a procedural operating system|
|US5459865 *||5 abr. 1993||17 out. 1995||Taligent Inc.||Runtime loader|
|US5465362 *||30 dez. 1993||7 nov. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented view-system for displaying information in a windowing environment|
|US5471568 *||30 jun. 1993||28 nov. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented apparatus and method for scan line conversion of graphic edges|
|US5471629 *||20 jul. 1992||28 nov. 1995||Hewlett-Packard Company||Method of monitoring changes in an object-oriented database with tuned monitors|
|US5471675 *||27 jul. 1993||28 nov. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object oriented video framework system|
|US5473777 *||19 jul. 1993||5 dez. 1995||Moeller; Christopher P.||Wrapper for enabling an object otented application to maintain virtual memory using procedural function calls|
|US5475845 *||28 set. 1994||12 dez. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Wrapper system for interfacing an object-oriented application to a procedural operating system|
|US5479589 *||4 ago. 1993||26 dez. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented system for selecting a graphic image on a display|
|US5479601 *||13 abr. 1995||26 dez. 1995||Taligent, Inc.||Method and apparatus for processing commands generated by user interface controls in an atomic manner|
|US5481666 *||25 ago. 1993||2 jan. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented navigation system|
|US5485373 *||25 mar. 1993||16 jan. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Language-sensitive text searching system with modified Boyer-Moore process|
|US5487145 *||9 jul. 1993||23 jan. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Method and apparatus for compositing display items which minimizes locked drawing areas|
|US5491800 *||20 dez. 1993||13 fev. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented remote procedure call networking system|
|US5493728 *||23 jul. 1993||20 fev. 1996||Borland International, Inc.||System and methods for optimized access in a multi-user environment|
|US5495577 *||10 jul. 1995||27 fev. 1996||Taligent||System for displaying insertion text based on preexisting text display characteristics|
|US5495607 *||15 nov. 1993||27 fev. 1996||Conner Peripherals, Inc.||Network management system having virtual catalog overview of files distributively stored across network domain|
|US5497491 *||26 jan. 1993||5 mar. 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for importing and exporting data between an object oriented computing environment and an external computing environment|
|US5499343 *||17 dez. 1993||12 mar. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented networking system with dynamically configurable communication links|
|US5500929 *||30 ago. 1993||19 mar. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||System for browsing a network resource book with tabs attached to pages|
|US5500931 *||10 jul. 1995||19 mar. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||System for applying font style changes to multi-script text|
|US5504892 *||8 set. 1994||2 abr. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Extensible object-oriented file system|
|US5511002 *||13 set. 1993||23 abr. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Multimedia player component object system|
|US5515508 *||17 dez. 1993||7 maio 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Client server system and method of operation including a dynamically configurable protocol stack|
|US5517606 *||2 ago. 1994||14 maio 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented menuing system using command objects of an object-oriented operation system|
|US5519818 *||19 set. 1994||21 maio 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented graphic picking system|
|US5519862 *||26 fev. 1993||21 maio 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Concurrent processing apparatus with incremental command objects|
|US5519867 *||19 jul. 1993||21 maio 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented multitasking system|
|US5522025 *||25 out. 1993||28 maio 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented window area display system|
|US5524190 *||4 jun. 1993||4 jun. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Command object logging system for restoring documents|
|US5524199 *||30 dez. 1993||4 jun. 1996||Taligent||Object-oriented view system with background processing of update request|
|US5524200 *||30 dez. 1993||4 jun. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented non-rectilinear viewing framework|
|US5530799 *||17 dez. 1993||25 jun. 1996||Taligent Inc.||Rendering cache in an object oriented system|
|US5530864 *||23 dez. 1992||25 jun. 1996||Taligent||Command object system for an object-oriented software platform|
|US5537526 *||12 nov. 1993||16 jul. 1996||Taugent, Inc.||Method and apparatus for processing a display document utilizing a system level document framework|
|US5539906 *||24 maio 1995||23 jul. 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for controlling access to data elements in a data processing system based on status of an industrial process|
|US5544297 *||13 dez. 1995||6 ago. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented audio record/playback system|
|US5544301 *||30 dez. 1993||6 ago. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented view layout system|
|US5544302 *||3 jun. 1993||6 ago. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented framework for creating and using container objects with built-in properties|
|US5546595 *||21 dez. 1993||13 ago. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented system using objects representing hardware devices, physical connectors and connections between the physical connectors for configuring a computer|
|US5548723 *||17 dez. 1993||20 ago. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented network protocol configuration system utilizing a dynamically configurable protocol stack|
|US5548726 *||17 dez. 1993||20 ago. 1996||Taligeni, Inc.||System for activating new service in client server network by reconfiguring the multilayer network protocol stack dynamically within the server node|
|US5548779 *||21 dez. 1993||20 ago. 1996||Taligent||System for providing system services for a device to a client using stack definition and stack description of a stack having top, intermediate, and bottom service objects|
|US5550563 *||23 dez. 1992||27 ago. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Interaction framework system|
|US5551055 *||23 dez. 1992||27 ago. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||System for providing locale dependent user interface for presenting control graphic which has different contents or same contents displayed in a predetermined order|
|US5553279 *||8 out. 1993||3 set. 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Lossless distribution of time series data in a relational data base network|
|US5553282 *||9 dez. 1994||3 set. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Software project history database and method of operation|
|US5555368 *||30 dez. 1993||10 set. 1996||Taligent||Object-oriented multi-tasking view framework|
|US5555427 *||21 dez. 1990||10 set. 1996||Fujitsu Limited||Distributed processing in a system of computers at terminals connected by a communication network|
|US5566278 *||24 ago. 1993||15 out. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object oriented printing system|
|US5566346 *||21 dez. 1993||15 out. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||System for constructing hardware device interface software systems independent of operating systems including capability of installing and removing interrupt handlers|
|US5574915 *||21 dez. 1993||12 nov. 1996||Taligent||Object-oriented booting framework|
|US5577251 *||7 nov. 1995||19 nov. 1996||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Object oriented system for executing application call by using plurality of client-side subcontract mechanism associated with corresponding plurality of server-side subcontract mechanism|
|US5583977 *||21 out. 1993||10 dez. 1996||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented curve manipulation system|
|US5586236 *||11 ago. 1993||17 dez. 1996||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Universal color look up table and method of generation|
|US5586252 *||24 maio 1994||17 dez. 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||System for failure mode and effects analysis|
|US5590269 *||22 abr. 1994||31 dez. 1996||Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company||Resource assignment system providing mixed-initiative user interface updates|
|US5592664 *||7 set. 1994||7 jan. 1997||Borland International Inc.||Database server system with methods for alerting clients of occurrence of database server events of interest to the clients|
|US5594642 *||31 maio 1996||14 jan. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Input methods framework|
|US5594921 *||17 dez. 1993||14 jan. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Authentication of users with dynamically configurable protocol stack|
|US5596746 *||26 out. 1994||21 jan. 1997||General Electric Company||Method for transforming relational data base schemas into object models using ideal table meta models|
|US5613122 *||14 nov. 1994||18 mar. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object-oriented operating system|
|US5615326 *||30 dez. 1993||25 mar. 1997||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented viewing framework having view grouping|
|US5621434 *||11 ago. 1993||15 abr. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Cursor manipulation system and method|
|US5630131 *||14 nov. 1994||13 maio 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Method and apparatus for importing and exporting archive files for a graphical user interface|
|US5630141 *||7 mar. 1996||13 maio 1997||Taligent, Inc.||Hierarchical apparatus and method for processing device interrupts in a computer system|
|US5634057 *||18 dez. 1995||27 maio 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Place object display system having place objects selected in response to a user identifier|
|US5634129 *||20 dez. 1995||27 maio 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object oriented system for representing physical locations|
|US5638504 *||29 mar. 1996||10 jun. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||System and method of processing documents with document proxies|
|US5640565 *||28 nov. 1995||17 jun. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Business card system|
|US5640587 *||3 ago. 1995||17 jun. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object-oriented rule-based text transliteration system|
|US5644720 *||31 jul. 1995||1 jul. 1997||West Publishing Company||Interprocess communications interface for managing transaction requests|
|US5644768 *||9 dez. 1994||1 jul. 1997||Borland International, Inc.||Systems and methods for sharing resources in a multi-user environment|
|US5652835 *||27 set. 1995||29 jul. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Method and apparatus for generating test data for an automated software testing system|
|US5652884 *||14 nov. 1994||29 jul. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Method and apparatus for dynamic update of an existing object in an object editor|
|US5659735 *||9 dez. 1994||19 ago. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object-oriented system for program version and history database management system for various program components|
|US5668997 *||18 dez. 1995||16 set. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object-oriented system for servicing windows|
|US5675748 *||8 mar. 1996||7 out. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Method and apparatus for automatically configuring computer system hardware and software|
|US5678042 *||24 jan. 1996||14 out. 1997||Seagate Technology, Inc.||Network management system having historical virtual catalog snapshots for overview of historical changes to files distributively stored across network domain|
|US5680563 *||25 jul. 1994||21 out. 1997||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented operating system enhancement for filtering items in a window|
|US5680602 *||17 jul. 1996||21 out. 1997||International Business Machines Corporation||Trigger generation in an active database management system|
|US5680613 *||19 jan. 1993||21 out. 1997||Ryo Atsumi||Data processing system using versioned documents having temporary links|
|US5680624 *||21 dez. 1993||21 out. 1997||Object Licensing Corporation||Object oriented interrupt system|
|US5696965 *||3 nov. 1994||9 dez. 1997||Intel Corporation||Electronic information appraisal agent|
|US5706517 *||8 mar. 1996||6 jan. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Method and apparatus for retrieving distributed objects in a networked system|
|US5710896 *||6 mar. 1996||20 jan. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented graphic system with extensible damage repair and drawing constraints|
|US5713045 *||29 jun. 1995||27 jan. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||System for processing user events with input device entity associated with event producer which further links communication from event consumer to the event producer|
|US5717877 *||6 jun. 1995||10 fev. 1998||Object Licensing Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented data access framework system|
|US5720008 *||27 fev. 1997||17 fev. 1998||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Knowledge base management system with dependency information for procedural tests|
|US5729671 *||8 mar. 1996||17 mar. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object-oriented method and apparatus for rendering a 3D surface image on a two-dimensional display|
|US5732229 *||13 jun. 1996||24 mar. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Method and apparatus for displaying business cards|
|US5732271 *||23 jan. 1995||24 mar. 1998||International Business Machines Corporation||Data processing system and method for processing an object oriented development environment employing property inheritance using prototypical objects|
|US5734852 *||8 mar. 1996||31 mar. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Method and apparatus for displaying hardware dependent graphics in an object-oriented operating system|
|US5734863 *||17 ago. 1994||31 mar. 1998||National Instruments Corporation||Method and apparatus for providing improved type compatibility and data structure organization in a graphical data flow diagram|
|US5737536 *||2 nov. 1995||7 abr. 1998||Borland International, Inc.||System and methods for optimized access in a multi-user environment|
|US5737559 *||20 dez. 1995||7 abr. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented view hierarchy framework|
|US5740549 *||12 jun. 1995||14 abr. 1998||Pointcast, Inc.||Information and advertising distribution system and method|
|US5742813 *||12 set. 1995||21 abr. 1998||Cadis, Inc.||Method and apparatus for concurrency in an object oriented database using lock inheritance based on class objects|
|US5752042 *||7 jun. 1996||12 maio 1998||International Business Machines Corporation||Server computer for selecting program updates for a client computer based on results of recognizer program(s) furnished to the client computer|
|US5752245 *||9 dez. 1994||12 maio 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented system for configuration history management with a project workspace and project history database for draft identification|
|US5758153 *||24 out. 1995||26 maio 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object oriented file system in an object oriented operating system|
|US5768511 *||18 set. 1995||16 jun. 1998||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for managing objects in networked computer system with action performed in the server and object updated in the client|
|US5778230 *||13 nov. 1995||7 jul. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Goal directed object-oriented debugging system|
|US5778356 *||8 nov. 1996||7 jul. 1998||Cadis, Inc.||Dynamically selectable language display system for object oriented database management system|
|US5787245 *||13 nov. 1995||28 jul. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Portable debugging service utilizing a client debugger object and a server debugger object|
|US5787251 *||18 nov. 1996||28 jul. 1998||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for subcontracts in distributed processing systems|
|US5787415 *||30 out. 1996||28 jul. 1998||International Business Machines Corporation||Low maintenance data delivery and refresh system for decision support system database|
|US5787448 *||13 dez. 1995||28 jul. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Dynamic linking system|
|US5790132 *||7 dez. 1995||4 ago. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Image rendering system with extensible mechanism for providing visual user feedback when an image graphic is selected|
|US5796969 *||20 dez. 1995||18 ago. 1998||Object Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented view coordinate space system|
|US5809317 *||5 jun. 1997||15 set. 1998||Intel Corporation||Creating and maintaining hypertext links among heterogeneous documents by the establishment of anchors and connections among anchors|
|US5812850 *||13 nov. 1995||22 set. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object-oriented symbolic debugger using a compiler driven database and state modeling to control program execution|
|US5815653 *||13 nov. 1995||29 set. 1998||You; Lawrence L.||Debugging system with portable debug environment-independent client and non-portable platform-specific server|
|US5822580 *||19 jan. 1996||13 out. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object oriented programming based global registry system, method, and article of manufacture|
|US5826253 *||19 abr. 1996||20 out. 1998||Borland International, Inc.||Database system with methodology for notifying clients of any additions, deletions, or modifications occurring at the database server which affect validity of a range of data records cached in local memory buffers of clients|
|US5832219 *||20 dez. 1995||3 nov. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Distributed object networking service|
|US5835910 *||12 set. 1995||10 nov. 1998||Cadis, Inc.||Method and system for comparing attributes in an object-oriented management system|
|US5838965 *||10 nov. 1994||17 nov. 1998||Cadis, Inc.||Object oriented database management system|
|US5848291 *||15 set. 1995||8 dez. 1998||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object-oriented framework for creating multimedia applications|
|US5862325 *||27 set. 1996||19 jan. 1999||Intermind Corporation||Computer-based communication system and method using metadata defining a control structure|
|US5864668 *||17 abr. 1996||26 jan. 1999||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||System for connecting a client to a server with a protocol stack dynamically constructed by using top and bottom service descriptions as query parameters|
|US5867707 *||24 mar. 1997||2 fev. 1999||Hitachi Software Engineering Co., Ltd.||Device for building programs employing objects linkage information|
|US5872909 *||7 jun. 1995||16 fev. 1999||Wind River Systems, Inc.||Logic analyzer for software|
|US5877768 *||19 jun. 1996||2 mar. 1999||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Method and system using a sorting table to order 2D shapes and 2D projections of 3D shapes for rendering a composite drawing|
|US5893125 *||22 set. 1997||6 abr. 1999||Borland International, Inc.||Non-modal database system with methods for incremental maintenance|
|US5896532 *||15 jun. 1992||20 abr. 1999||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Objects with run-time classes and methods of making them|
|US5907846 *||7 jun. 1996||25 maio 1999||Electronic Data Systems Corporation||Method and system for accessing relational databases using objects|
|US5912666 *||22 abr. 1997||15 jun. 1999||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object-oriented global cursor tool|
|US5918224 *||26 jul. 1995||29 jun. 1999||Borland International, Inc.||Client/server database system with methods for providing clients with server-based bi-directional scrolling at the server|
|US5936643 *||28 nov. 1995||10 ago. 1999||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Method and apparatus for graphical data|
|US5953715 *||3 nov. 1997||14 set. 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Utilizing pseudotables as a method and mechanism providing database monitor information|
|US5956508 *||7 abr. 1997||21 set. 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Creation of manageable management collections using filters|
|US5969719 *||17 jun. 1997||19 out. 1999||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Computer generating a time-variable icon for an audio signal|
|US5973702 *||7 jun. 1995||26 out. 1999||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Oriented view system having a common window manager for defining application window areas in a screen buffer and application specific view objects for writing into the screen buffer|
|US6006190 *||28 abr. 1998||21 dez. 1999||Tartaroukos Llc||Computer implemented method and a computer system for enforcing software licenses|
|US6006242 *||5 abr. 1996||21 dez. 1999||Bankers Systems, Inc.||Apparatus and method for dynamically creating a document|
|US6014139 *||1 abr. 1999||11 jan. 2000||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented global cursor tool|
|US6029175 *||7 jun. 1996||22 fev. 2000||Teknowledge Corporation||Automatic retrieval of changed files by a network software agent|
|US6031977 *||18 dez. 1995||29 fev. 2000||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object-oriented distributed communications directory service|
|US6035399 *||7 abr. 1995||7 mar. 2000||Hewlett-Packard Company||Checkpoint object|
|US6040838 *||5 nov. 1993||21 mar. 2000||Obejct Technology Licensing Corporation||Graphic state processing|
|US6044205 *||29 fev. 1996||28 mar. 2000||Intermind Corporation||Communications system for transferring information between memories according to processes transferred with the information|
|US6049809 *||30 out. 1996||11 abr. 2000||Microsoft Corporation||Replication optimization system and method|
|US6061740 *||15 jul. 1997||9 maio 2000||Novell, Inc.||Method and apparatus for heterogeneous network management|
|US6067641 *||9 fev. 1999||23 maio 2000||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Demand-based generation of symbolic information|
|US6074434 *||7 mar. 1997||13 jun. 2000||International Business Machines Corporation||Selection of code updates, data updates or new data for client|
|US6088717 *||31 ago. 1998||11 jul. 2000||Onename Corporation||Computer-based communication system and method using metadata defining a control-structure|
|US6125388 *||1 dez. 1997||26 set. 2000||Reisman; Richard R.||System for transporting information objects between a user station and multiple remote sources based upon user modifiable object manifest stored in the user station|
|US6138162 *||11 fev. 1997||24 out. 2000||Pointcast, Inc.||Method and apparatus for configuring a client to redirect requests to a caching proxy server based on a category ID with the request|
|US6146027 *||23 jul. 1997||14 nov. 2000||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Method and apparatus for providing an object-oriented application interface for a computer system|
|US6151700 *||20 out. 1997||21 nov. 2000||International Business Machines Corporation||Object oriented distributed programming system for computer controlled networks with selective capture of program property data identifying a particular program version|
|US6158045 *||13 nov. 1995||5 dez. 2000||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Portable debugging services utilizing a client debugger object and a server debugger object with flexible addressing support|
|US6158903 *||3 ago. 1995||12 dez. 2000||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Apparatus and method for allowing computer systems with different input/output devices to collaboratively edit data|
|US6169550||24 fev. 1999||2 jan. 2001||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object oriented method and system to draw 2D and 3D shapes onto a projection plane|
|US6169992||8 nov. 1996||2 jan. 2001||Cadis Inc.||Search engine for remote access to database management systems|
|US6173311||13 fev. 1997||9 jan. 2001||Pointcast, Inc.||Apparatus, method and article of manufacture for servicing client requests on a network|
|US6195092||14 jul. 1998||27 fev. 2001||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Software utility for creating and editing a multidimensional oil-well log graphics presentation|
|US6202098 *||4 jan. 1995||13 mar. 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for object oriented notification|
|US6223217||26 out. 1998||24 abr. 2001||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Distributed object networking service|
|US6259446||23 dez. 1992||10 jul. 2001||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Menu state system|
|US6269369 *||2 nov. 1997||31 jul. 2001||Amazon.Com Holdings, Inc.||Networked personal contact manager|
|US6275983||26 ago. 1998||14 ago. 2001||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object-oriented operating system|
|US6351752||8 jul. 1998||26 fev. 2002||Ncr Corporation||Method and apparatus for detecting changes to a collection of objects|
|US6351778||5 nov. 1998||26 fev. 2002||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented operating system|
|US6360266||25 fev. 1999||19 mar. 2002||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented distributed communications directory system|
|US6374252||16 out. 1997||16 abr. 2002||I2 Technologies Us, Inc.||Modeling of object-oriented database structures, translation to relational database structures, and dynamic searches thereon|
|US6377962||21 jun. 1999||23 abr. 2002||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Software program for routing graphic image data between a source located in a first address space and a destination located in a second address space|
|US6385724||30 nov. 1998||7 maio 2002||Microsoft Corporation||Automatic object caller chain with declarative impersonation and transitive trust|
|US6401090 *||24 jun. 1999||4 jun. 2002||Teltronics, Inc.||Method and apparatus for accessing data stored in database of telephone system|
|US6408429||10 mar. 2000||18 jun. 2002||Cognex Corporation||Machine vision system for identifying and assessing features of an article|
|US6412017 *||1 jul. 1996||25 jun. 2002||Microsoft Corporation||Urgent replication facility|
|US6421692||20 nov. 1998||16 jul. 2002||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented multimedia [data routing system] presentation control system|
|US6424354||1 abr. 1999||23 jul. 2002||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented event notification system with listener registration of both interests and methods|
|US6425016 *||27 maio 1997||23 jul. 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for providing collaborative replicated objects for synchronous distributed groupware applications|
|US6425017||17 ago. 1998||23 jul. 2002||Microsoft Corporation||Queued method invocations on distributed component applications|
|US6442620||17 ago. 1998||27 ago. 2002||Microsoft Corporation||Environment extensibility and automatic services for component applications using contexts, policies and activators|
|US6442688 *||29 ago. 1997||27 ago. 2002||Entrust Technologies Limited||Method and apparatus for obtaining status of public key certificate updates|
|US6453328||12 abr. 1999||17 set. 2002||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Model tracking object-oriented system for collaborative data editing with non-compatible computer peripheral devices|
|US6457063 *||30 abr. 1998||24 set. 2002||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Method, apparatus & computer program product for dynamic administration, management and monitoring of daemon processes|
|US6487665||30 nov. 1998||26 nov. 2002||Microsoft Corporation||Object security boundaries|
|US6513034||21 dez. 1999||28 jan. 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Deriving uniqueness for indices on summary tables|
|US6532498 *||13 nov. 1997||11 mar. 2003||Computer Associates Think, Inc.||Method and system for event notification between software application program objects|
|US6549949||31 ago. 1999||15 abr. 2003||Accenture Llp||Fixed format stream in a communication services patterns environment|
|US6564270||20 jan. 1999||13 maio 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Isolating client application requests for device services through an object-oriented service stack system|
|US6571282||31 ago. 1999||27 maio 2003||Accenture Llp||Block-based communication in a communication services patterns environment|
|US6574736||30 nov. 1998||3 jun. 2003||Microsoft Corporation||Composable roles|
|US6578068||31 ago. 1999||10 jun. 2003||Accenture Llp||Load balancer in environment services patterns|
|US6594692||29 abr. 1996||15 jul. 2003||Richard R. Reisman||Methods for transacting electronic commerce|
|US6601192||31 ago. 1999||29 jul. 2003||Accenture Llp||Assertion component in environment services patterns|
|US6601234 *||31 ago. 1999||29 jul. 2003||Accenture Llp||Attribute dictionary in a business logic services environment|
|US6604093||27 dez. 1999||5 ago. 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Situation awareness system|
|US6604198||3 maio 2002||5 ago. 2003||Microsoft Corporation||Automatic object caller chain with declarative impersonation and transitive trust|
|US6606711||29 out. 2002||12 ago. 2003||Microsoft Corporation||Object security boundaries|
|US6606742||20 ago. 1999||12 ago. 2003||Taligent, Inc.||Object-oriented interface for portability to diverse operating systems or hardware platforms|
|US6611862||20 abr. 2000||26 ago. 2003||Richard R. Reisman||User station software that controls transport and presentation of content from a remote source|
|US6615253||31 ago. 1999||2 set. 2003||Accenture Llp||Efficient server side data retrieval for execution of client side applications|
|US6625617||8 dez. 2000||23 set. 2003||Timeline, Inc.||Modularized data retrieval method and apparatus with multiple source capability|
|US6636242||31 ago. 1999||21 out. 2003||Accenture Llp||View configurer in a presentation services patterns environment|
|US6640238||31 ago. 1999||28 out. 2003||Accenture Llp||Activity component in a presentation services patterns environment|
|US6640244||31 ago. 1999||28 out. 2003||Accenture Llp||Request batcher in a transaction services patterns environment|
|US6640249||31 ago. 1999||28 out. 2003||Accenture Llp||Presentation services patterns in a netcentric environment|
|US6658464||20 abr. 2000||2 dez. 2003||Richard R. Reisman||User station software that controls transport, storage, and presentation of content from a remote source|
|US6684261||29 ago. 1995||27 jan. 2004||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented operating system|
|US6712702||16 mar. 2001||30 mar. 2004||Sheldon F. Goldberg||Method and system for playing games on a network|
|US6714962||16 mar. 2000||30 mar. 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Multi-user server application architecture with single-user object tier|
|US6715145||31 ago. 1999||30 mar. 2004||Accenture Llp||Processing pipeline in a base services pattern environment|
|US6724875||9 jun. 1997||20 abr. 2004||Sbc Technology Resources, Inc.||Flexible network platform and call processing system|
|US6742015||31 ago. 1999||25 maio 2004||Accenture Llp||Base services patterns in a netcentric environment|
|US6748455||23 fev. 1999||8 jun. 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Object connectivity through loosely coupled publish and subscribe events with filtering|
|US6748555||9 set. 1999||8 jun. 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Object-based software management|
|US6769009||20 abr. 2000||27 jul. 2004||Richard R. Reisman||Method and system for selecting a personalized set of information channels|
|US6785722 *||20 mar. 1998||31 ago. 2004||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Apparatus, methods, and computer program products for transactional support of network management operations|
|US6807558||2 jun. 1998||19 out. 2004||Pointcast, Inc.||Utilization of information “push” technology|
|US6829770||23 fev. 1999||7 dez. 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Object connectivity through loosely coupled publish and subscribe events|
|US6842906||31 ago. 1999||11 jan. 2005||Accenture Llp||System and method for a refreshable proxy pool in a communication services patterns environment|
|US6925513 *||4 maio 1999||2 ago. 2005||Apple Computer, Inc.||USB device notification|
|US6928655 *||16 dez. 1999||9 ago. 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Live presentation searching|
|US6954220||31 ago. 1999||11 out. 2005||Accenture Llp||User context component in environment services patterns|
|US6981208||12 jun. 2002||27 dez. 2005||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Multimedia data routing system and method|
|US6988270 *||26 abr. 2002||17 jan. 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for providing collaborative replicated objects for synchronous distributed groupware application|
|US7007104||12 jan. 2000||28 fev. 2006||Aprisma Management Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for integrated network management and systems management in communications networks|
|US7043727||8 jun. 2001||9 maio 2006||Micromuse Ltd.||Method and system for efficient distribution of network event data|
|US7076784||22 out. 1999||11 jul. 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Software component execution management using context objects for tracking externally-defined intrinsic properties of executing software components within an execution environment|
|US7080372||12 jun. 2000||18 jul. 2006||Lenovo (Singapore) Pte Ltd.||System and method for managing system configuration across a network|
|US7162472 *||24 jun. 2003||9 jan. 2007||Microsoft Corporation||System and method for database change notification|
|US7200847||23 maio 2002||3 abr. 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Urgent replication facility|
|US7203778 *||17 set. 2004||10 abr. 2007||Apple Inc.||Method and system for notifying clients of a specific change in a data processing system|
|US7203868 *||26 nov. 2003||10 abr. 2007||Unisys Corporation||Dynamic monitoring of resources using snapshots of system states|
|US7228300||7 maio 2003||5 jun. 2007||Oracle International Corporation||Caching the results of security policy functions|
|US7237245||18 nov. 2004||26 jun. 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Object connectivity through loosely coupled publish and subscribe events|
|US7240244||8 jun. 2004||3 jul. 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Object-based software management|
|US7243271||8 jun. 2004||10 jul. 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Wrapped object for observing object events|
|US7289964||31 ago. 1999||30 out. 2007||Accenture Llp||System and method for transaction services patterns in a netcentric environment|
|US7305384||30 nov. 2004||4 dez. 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Live presentation searching|
|US7310647||23 jan. 2004||18 dez. 2007||Oracle International Corporation||Column masking of tables|
|US7360159||18 set. 2003||15 abr. 2008||Qarbon.Com, Inc.||System for creating media presentations of computer software application programs|
|US7363368||24 dez. 2001||22 abr. 2008||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for transaction recording and playback|
|US7363587||25 jul. 2002||22 abr. 2008||Apple Inc.||Method and apparatus for supporting real-time collaboration|
|US7383191||28 nov. 2000||3 jun. 2008||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for predicting causes of network service outages using time domain correlation|
|US7389514||26 maio 2004||17 jun. 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Software component execution management using context objects for tracking externally-defined intrinsic properties of executing software components within an execution environment|
|US7423979||26 set. 2003||9 set. 2008||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for determining network characteristics using routing protocols|
|US7424704||27 ago. 2003||9 set. 2008||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented operating system|
|US7430620||20 fev. 2007||30 set. 2008||Apple Inc.||Change notification in USB devices|
|US7430744 *||21 abr. 2006||30 set. 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Urgent replication facility|
|US7454429||24 dez. 2004||18 nov. 2008||Alan S Rojer||Declarative Dispatch|
|US7461381||23 dez. 2003||2 dez. 2008||At&T Labs, Inc.||Flexible network platform and call processing system|
|US7478405||29 set. 2004||13 jan. 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Object connectivity through loosely coupled publish and subscribe events|
|US7496943||11 fev. 2000||24 fev. 2009||Beneficial Innovations, Inc.||Network system for presenting advertising|
|US7516208||20 jul. 2001||7 abr. 2009||International Business Machines Corporation||Event database management method and system for network event reporting system|
|US7565440||30 nov. 2004||21 jul. 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Live presentation searching|
|US7634777||6 jan. 2005||15 dez. 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Queued component interface passing for results outflow from queued method invocations|
|US7647400||7 dez. 2006||12 jan. 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Dynamically exchanging computer user's context|
|US7653687||8 jun. 2007||26 jan. 2010||Reisman Richard R||Method for distributing content to a user station|
|US7676453||22 abr. 2004||9 mar. 2010||Oracle International Corporation||Partial query caching|
|US7689919||5 nov. 2004||30 mar. 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Requesting computer user's context data|
|US7734780||17 mar. 2008||8 jun. 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Automated response to computer users context|
|US7739607 *||14 nov. 2006||15 jun. 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Supplying notifications related to supply and consumption of user context data|
|US7765181 *||18 jun. 2003||27 jul. 2010||Shawn Thomas||Web-based asset management|
|US7778900 *||13 set. 2004||17 ago. 2010||Sap Ag||Method and software application for computer-aided cash collection|
|US7779015||8 nov. 2004||17 ago. 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Logging and analyzing context attributes|
|US7788678 *||20 mar. 2007||31 ago. 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Urgent replication facility|
|US7814499||12 dez. 2005||12 out. 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Urgent replication facility|
|US7823065||12 out. 2005||26 out. 2010||Kenneth James Hintz||Lexicon-based new idea detector|
|US7827281||11 jun. 2007||2 nov. 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Dynamically determining a computer user's context|
|US7836031 *||28 mar. 2003||16 nov. 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Systems and methods for employing a trigger-based mechanism to detect a database table change and registering to receive notification of the change|
|US7873660||27 fev. 2003||18 jan. 2011||Oracle International Corporation||Enforcing data privacy aggregations|
|US7877686||15 out. 2001||25 jan. 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Dynamically displaying current status of tasks|
|US7899952||22 set. 2008||1 mar. 2011||Apple Inc.||Change notification in USB devices|
|US7945859||17 dez. 2008||17 maio 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Interface for exchanging context data|
|US7962481 *||10 jun. 2004||14 jun. 2011||Oracle International Corporation||Query based invalidation subscription|
|US7966291||26 jun. 2007||21 jun. 2011||Google Inc.||Fact-based object merging|
|US7970766||23 jul. 2007||28 jun. 2011||Google Inc.||Entity type assignment|
|US7991797||17 fev. 2006||2 ago. 2011||Google Inc.||ID persistence through normalization|
|US8015030||22 fev. 2010||6 set. 2011||Health Hero Network, Inc.||User-based health monitoring|
|US8020104||11 jan. 2005||13 set. 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Contextual responses based on automated learning techniques|
|US8024399||31 ago. 2006||20 set. 2011||Twintech E.U., Limited Liability Company||Software distribution over a network|
|US8041595||20 jul. 2009||18 out. 2011||Amazon Technologies, Inc.||Social networking system capable of notifying a user of profile updates made by the user's contacts|
|US8050969||6 jun. 2008||1 nov. 2011||News America Marketing Properties Llc||Interactive marketing network and process using electronic certificates|
|US8065702||23 fev. 2009||22 nov. 2011||Beneficial Innovations, Inc.||Network advertising and game playing|
|US8069204||31 ago. 2006||29 nov. 2011||Twintech E.U., Limited Liability Company||Providing and receiving content over a wireless communication system|
|US8078573||4 nov. 2010||13 dez. 2011||Google Inc.||Identifying the unifying subject of a set of facts|
|US8078595||9 out. 2007||13 dez. 2011||Oracle International Corporation||Secure normal forms|
|US8103665||11 maio 2009||24 jan. 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Soliciting information based on a computer user's context|
|US8122026||20 out. 2006||21 fev. 2012||Google Inc.||Finding and disambiguating references to entities on web pages|
|US8126759||19 maio 2011||28 fev. 2012||Amazon Technologies, Inc.||Social networking system capable of notifying users of profile updates made by their contacts|
|US8126979||13 abr. 2010||28 fev. 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Automated response to computer users context|
|US8131883||20 abr. 2000||6 mar. 2012||Intellectual Ventures I, Limited Liability Company||Method for distributing content to a user station|
|US8150790||31 jan. 2007||3 abr. 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Lightweight physical design alerter|
|US8181113||27 out. 2008||15 maio 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Mediating conflicts in computer users context data|
|US8225214||19 fev. 2009||17 jul. 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Supplying enhanced computer user's context data|
|US8239350||8 maio 2007||7 ago. 2012||Google Inc.||Date ambiguity resolution|
|US8239396||20 mar. 2009||7 ago. 2012||Oracle International Corporation||View mechanism for data security, privacy and utilization|
|US8244689||17 fev. 2006||14 ago. 2012||Google Inc.||Attribute entropy as a signal in object normalization|
|US8260785||17 fev. 2006||4 set. 2012||Google Inc.||Automatic object reference identification and linking in a browseable fact repository|
|US8266124||17 dez. 2002||11 set. 2012||Caldvor Acquisitions Ltd., Llc||Integrated asset management|
|US8296412||13 jan. 2004||23 out. 2012||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for event impact analysis|
|US8321468||29 out. 2010||27 nov. 2012||Caldvor Acquisitions Ltd., Llc||Web-based asset management|
|US8321499||8 jun. 2007||27 nov. 2012||Intellectual Ventures I Llc||Method for distributing content to a user station|
|US8346724||8 dez. 2008||1 jan. 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Generating and supplying user context data|
|US8347202||14 mar. 2007||1 jan. 2013||Google Inc.||Determining geographic locations for place names in a fact repository|
|US8370200||28 set. 2011||5 fev. 2013||News America Marketing Properties Llc||Interactive marketing network and process using electronic certificates|
|US8380796||20 jul. 2009||19 fev. 2013||Amazon Technologies, Inc.||Social networking system|
|US8407682||1 out. 2004||26 mar. 2013||Intellectual Ventures I Llc||Software and method that enables selection of one of a plurality of online service providers|
|US8423642||6 dez. 2011||16 abr. 2013||Vizio, Inc.||System and method for controlled access to up-to-date contact information|
|US8484248||9 mar. 2012||9 jul. 2013||Caldvor Acquisitions Ltd., Llc||Web-based asset management|
|US8489997||7 maio 2010||16 jul. 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Supplying notifications related to supply and consumption of user context data|
|US8499030||20 abr. 2000||30 jul. 2013||Intellectual Ventures I Llc||Software and method that enables selection of one of a plurality of network communications service providers|
|US8626712||28 jun. 2010||7 jan. 2014||Microsoft Corporation||Logging and analyzing computer user's context data|
|US8631014||10 set. 2012||14 jan. 2014||Caldvor Acquisitions Ltd., Llc||Method and system for integrated asset management|
|US8635272||20 abr. 2012||21 jan. 2014||Intellectual Ventures I Llc||Method for distributing a list of updated content to a user station from a distribution server wherein the user station may defer installing the update|
|US8650175||13 jul. 2012||11 fev. 2014||Google Inc.||User interface for facts query engine with snippets from information sources that include query terms and answer terms|
|US8677248||14 maio 2009||18 mar. 2014||Microsoft Corporation||Requesting computer user's context data|
|US8682891||4 set. 2012||25 mar. 2014||Google Inc.||Automatic object reference identification and linking in a browseable fact repository|
|US8682913||31 mar. 2005||25 mar. 2014||Google Inc.||Corroborating facts extracted from multiple sources|
|US8700568||31 mar. 2006||15 abr. 2014||Google Inc.||Entity normalization via name normalization|
|US8719260||22 nov. 2011||6 maio 2014||Google Inc.||Identifying the unifying subject of a set of facts|
|US8719339||21 jul. 2010||6 maio 2014||Intellectual Ventures I Llc||Software and method that enables selection of one of a plurality of online service providers|
|US8738643||2 ago. 2007||27 maio 2014||Google Inc.||Learning synonymous object names from anchor texts|
|US8751498||1 fev. 2012||10 jun. 2014||Google Inc.||Finding and disambiguating references to entities on web pages|
|US8762471||23 jan. 2013||24 jun. 2014||Amazon Technologies, Inc.||Social networking system capable of providing location-based notifications|
|US8775245||11 fev. 2010||8 jul. 2014||News America Marketing Properties, Llc||Secure coupon distribution|
|US8812435||16 nov. 2007||19 ago. 2014||Google Inc.||Learning objects and facts from documents|
|US8812620||30 out. 2007||19 ago. 2014||Intellectual Property I LLC||Software and method that enables selection of one of a plurality of online service providers|
|US8825471||31 mar. 2006||2 set. 2014||Google Inc.||Unsupervised extraction of facts|
|US8825702||24 fev. 2004||2 set. 2014||Oracle International Corporation||Sending control information with database statement|
|US8825712||8 jul. 2013||2 set. 2014||Caldvor Acquisitions Ltd., Llc||Web-based asset management|
|US8825872||9 mar. 2009||2 set. 2014||Intellectual Ventures I Llc||Software and method for monitoring a data stream and for capturing desired data within the data stream|
|US8850409||21 maio 2008||30 set. 2014||Optumsoft, Inc.||Notification-based constraint set translation to imperative execution|
|US8856646||27 mar. 2008||7 out. 2014||Caldvor Acquisitions Ltd., Llc||Asset transition project management|
|US8892495||8 jan. 2013||18 nov. 2014||Blanding Hovenweep, Llc||Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-interface therefore|
|US8996470 *||31 maio 2005||31 mar. 2015||Google Inc.||System for ensuring the internal consistency of a fact repository|
|US9092495||28 fev. 2014||28 jul. 2015||Google Inc.||Automatic object reference identification and linking in a browseable fact repository|
|US9111604||31 ago. 2006||18 ago. 2015||Intellectual Ventures I Llc||Software and method that enables selection of on-line content from one of a plurality of network content service providers in a single action|
|US9183306||30 jun. 2008||10 nov. 2015||Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc||Automated selection of appropriate information based on a computer user's context|
|US9197605||14 abr. 2013||24 nov. 2015||Vizio, Inc||System and method for controlled access to up-to-date personal information|
|US9208229||31 mar. 2006||8 dez. 2015||Google Inc.||Anchor text summarization for corroboration|
|US9348914||12 mar. 2010||24 maio 2016||Caldvor Acquisitions Ltd., Llc||Web-based asset management|
|US9372555||27 jun. 2001||21 jun. 2016||Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc||Managing interactions between computer users' context models|
|US9443037||19 jul. 2006||13 set. 2016||Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc||Storing and recalling information to augment human memories|
|US9484077||29 set. 2010||1 nov. 2016||Intellectual Ventures I Llc||Providing services from a remote computer system to a user station over a communications network|
|US9484078||29 set. 2010||1 nov. 2016||Intellectual Ventures I Llc||Providing services from a remote computer system to a user station over a communications network|
|US9530150||22 jan. 2009||27 dez. 2016||Adcension, Llc||Compensation model for network services|
|US9535563||12 nov. 2013||3 jan. 2017||Blanding Hovenweep, Llc||Internet appliance system and method|
|US9537909||20 jun. 2014||3 jan. 2017||Amazon Technologies, Inc.||Social networking system capable of providing location-based notifications|
|US9558186||14 ago. 2014||31 jan. 2017||Google Inc.||Unsupervised extraction of facts|
|US9559917||15 jul. 2013||31 jan. 2017||Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc||Supplying notifications related to supply and consumption of user context data|
|US9710549||28 mar. 2014||18 jul. 2017||Google Inc.||Entity normalization via name normalization|
|US9760570||9 jun. 2014||12 set. 2017||Google Inc.||Finding and disambiguating references to entities on web pages|
|US20010025262 *||14 mar. 2001||27 set. 2001||Nadeem Ahmed||Computer apparatus for monitoring and updating accountancy records|
|US20020129175 *||26 abr. 2002||12 set. 2002||Banavar Guruduth Somasekhara||System and method for providing collaborative replicated objects for synchronous distributed groupware applications|
|US20020144252 *||23 maio 2002||3 out. 2002||Microsoft Corporation||Urgent replication facility|
|US20020170002 *||22 mar. 2001||14 nov. 2002||Steinberg Louis A.||Method and system for reducing false alarms in network fault management systems|
|US20030014462 *||8 jun. 2001||16 jan. 2003||Bennett Andrew Jonathan||Method and system for efficient distribution of network event data|
|US20030120690 *||25 jul. 2002||26 jun. 2003||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Method and apparatus for supporting real-time collaboration|
|US20030140031 *||17 dez. 2002||24 jul. 2003||Shawn Thomas||Method and system for improved help desk response|
|US20030140057 *||17 dez. 2002||24 jul. 2003||Shawn Thomas||Method and system for leased asset management|
|US20030154199 *||17 dez. 2002||14 ago. 2003||Shawn Thomas||Method and system for integrated asset management|
|US20030217042 *||18 jun. 2003||20 nov. 2003||Shawn Thomas||Method and system for Web-based asset management|
|US20040103416 *||27 ago. 2003||27 maio 2004||Orton Debra Lyn||Object-oriented operating system|
|US20040139043 *||13 jan. 2003||15 jul. 2004||Oracle International Corporation||Attribute relevant access control policies|
|US20040193653 *||28 mar. 2003||30 set. 2004||Howard Robert M.||Systems and methods for employing a trigger-based mechanism to detect a database table change and registering to receive notification of the change|
|US20040225668 *||8 jun. 2004||11 nov. 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Object-based software management|
|US20040225923 *||8 jun. 2004||11 nov. 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Object-based software management|
|US20040226001 *||8 jun. 2004||11 nov. 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Object-based software management|
|US20040233859 *||26 set. 2003||25 nov. 2004||Martin Daniel J.||Method and system for determining network characteristics using routing protocols|
|US20040249807 *||8 jul. 2004||9 dez. 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Live presentation searching|
|US20040267741 *||24 jun. 2003||30 dez. 2004||Microsoft Corporation||System and method for database change notification|
|US20050015441 *||23 dez. 2003||20 jan. 2005||Attwood Daren William||Distributed event notification system|
|US20050027845 *||13 jan. 2004||3 fev. 2005||Peter Secor||Method and system for event impact analysis|
|US20050044554 *||29 set. 2004||24 fev. 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Object connectivity through loosely coupled publish and subscribe events|
|US20050055381 *||10 jun. 2004||10 mar. 2005||Amit Ganesh||Active queries filter extraction|
|US20050055384 *||10 jun. 2004||10 mar. 2005||Amit Ganesh||Query based invalidation subscription|
|US20050076378 *||30 nov. 2004||7 abr. 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Live presentation searching|
|US20050078611 *||23 dez. 2003||14 abr. 2005||Sbc Technology Resources, Inc.||Flexible network platform and call processing system|
|US20050080847 *||30 nov. 2004||14 abr. 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Live presentation searching|
|US20050091158 *||13 set. 2004||28 abr. 2005||Mike Soumokil||Method and software application for computer-aided cash collection|
|US20050125804 *||6 jan. 2005||9 jun. 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Queued component interface passing for results outflow from queued method invocations|
|US20050144176 *||23 jan. 2004||30 jun. 2005||Oracle International Corporation||Column masking of tables|
|US20050157654 *||29 jul. 2004||21 jul. 2005||Farrell Craig A.||Apparatus and method for automated discovery and monitoring of relationships between network elements|
|US20050187958 *||24 fev. 2004||25 ago. 2005||Oracle International Corporation||Sending control information with database statement|
|US20050240570 *||22 abr. 2004||27 out. 2005||Oracle International Corporation||Partial query caching|
|US20050286685 *||24 jun. 2005||29 dez. 2005||Nikola Vukovljak||System and method for testing multiple dial-up points in a communications network|
|US20060112083 *||8 mar. 2005||25 maio 2006||Fujitsu Limited||Object relation information management program, method, and apparatus|
|US20060117039 *||12 out. 2005||1 jun. 2006||Hintz Kenneth J||Lexicon-based new idea detector|
|US20060136484 *||12 dez. 2005||22 jun. 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Urgent Replication Facility|
|US20060139539 *||27 jan. 2004||29 jun. 2006||Fu-Cheng Chen||Multi-domain vertical alignment liquid crystal display which generates circularly polarized light|
|US20060200831 *||21 abr. 2006||7 set. 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Urgent replication facility|
|US20070043459 *||19 jul. 2006||22 fev. 2007||Tangis Corporation||Storing and recalling information to augment human memories|
|US20070118588 *||22 nov. 2006||24 maio 2007||Brown Stephen J||Method and apparatus for remote health monitoring and providing health related information|
|US20070130524 *||14 nov. 2006||7 jun. 2007||Tangis Corporation||Supplying notifications related to supply and consumption of user context data|
|US20070143317 *||7 abr. 2006||21 jun. 2007||Andrew Hogue||Mechanism for managing facts in a fact repository|
|US20070150628 *||20 fev. 2007||28 jun. 2007||Clark Thomas C||USB device notification|
|US20070162519 *||20 mar. 2007||12 jul. 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Urgent Replication Facility|
|US20070168502 *||7 dez. 2006||19 jul. 2007||Tangis Corporation||Dynamically exchanging computer user's context|
|US20070198597 *||17 fev. 2006||23 ago. 2007||Betz Jonathan T||Attribute entropy as a signal in object normalization|
|US20070198600 *||31 mar. 2006||23 ago. 2007||Betz Jonathan T||Entity normalization via name normalization|
|US20070250295 *||30 mar. 2006||25 out. 2007||Subx, Inc.||Multidimensional modeling system and related method|
|US20070266318 *||12 jan. 2007||15 nov. 2007||Abbott Kenneth H||Managing interactions between computer users' context models|
|US20080109737 *||30 out. 2007||8 maio 2008||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Method and apparatus for supporting real-time collaboration|
|US20080147775 *||11 jun. 2007||19 jun. 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Dynamically swapping modules for determing a computer user's context|
|US20080183644 *||31 jan. 2007||31 jul. 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Lightweight physical design alerter|
|US20080183764 *||31 jan. 2007||31 jul. 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Continuous physical design tuning|
|US20080189225 *||24 mar. 2008||7 ago. 2008||David Herring||Method and System for Predicting Causes of Network Service Outages Using Time Domain Correlation|
|US20080215355 *||24 mar. 2008||4 set. 2008||David Herring||Method and System for Predicting Causes of Network Service Outages Using Time Domain Correlation|
|US20080250433 *||19 jun. 2008||9 out. 2008||Apple Inc.||Object-oriented operating system|
|US20080313271 *||17 mar. 2008||18 dez. 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Automated reponse to computer users context|
|US20090024570 *||20 jul. 2007||22 jan. 2009||Oracle Internatonal Corporation||User defined query rewrite mechanism|
|US20090037613 *||22 set. 2008||5 fev. 2009||Clark Thomas C||Change notification in USB devices|
|US20090094193 *||9 out. 2007||9 abr. 2009||Oracle International Corporation||Secure normal forms|
|US20090193442 *||19 jun. 2008||30 jul. 2009||Object Technology Licensing Corporation||Object-oriented operating system|
|US20090282120 *||20 jul. 2009||12 nov. 2009||Robertson Brian D||Social networking system|
|US20090282121 *||20 jul. 2009||12 nov. 2009||Robertson Brian D||Social networking system|
|US20090293046 *||21 maio 2008||26 nov. 2009||Optumsoft, Inc.||Notification-based constraint set translation to imperative execution|
|US20100241641 *||20 mar. 2009||23 set. 2010||Oracle International Corporation||View mechanism for data security, privacy and utilization|
|US20110047153 *||4 nov. 2010||24 fev. 2011||Betz Jonathan T||Identifying the Unifying Subject of a Set of Facts|
|US20110047170 *||29 out. 2010||24 fev. 2011||Shawn Thomas||Web-Based Asset Management|
|US20110185353 *||27 jan. 2010||28 jul. 2011||Jack Matthew||Mitigating Problems Arising From Incompatible Software|
|US20110219089 *||19 maio 2011||8 set. 2011||Robertson Brian D||Social networking system capable of notifying users of profile updates made by their contacts|
|US20120185278 *||29 mar. 2012||19 jul. 2012||Brown Stephen J||Method and apparatus for remote health monitoring and providing health related information|
|US20130080349 *||28 set. 2011||28 mar. 2013||International Business Machines Corporation||Management and notification of object model changes|
|USRE37258 *||14 out. 1998||3 jul. 2001||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object oriented printing system|
|USRE37722 *||17 mar. 1999||28 maio 2002||Object Technology Licensing Corp.||Object-oriented system for the transparent translation among locales of locale-dependent application programs|
|USRE44323||12 jun. 2008||25 jun. 2013||Beneficial Innovations, Inc.||Method and system for playing games on a network|
|USRE44566||5 abr. 2010||29 out. 2013||Beneficial Innovations, Inc.||Advertising system for the internet and local area networks|
|WO1996015501A1 *||13 nov. 1995||23 maio 1996||Cadis, Inc.||Object oriented database management system|
|WO2003003140A2||27 jun. 2002||9 jan. 2003||Compumedics Limited||Distributed event notification system|
|Classificação nos Estados Unidos||1/1, 710/260, 706/53, 707/E17.007, 707/999.201|
|Classificação cooperativa||Y10S707/99952, G06F17/30368|
|Classificação europeia||G06F17/30S8T, G06F17/30C|
|3 nov. 1989||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:RISCH, TORE J. M.;REEL/FRAME:005178/0016
Effective date: 19891030
|22 jan. 1996||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|15 fev. 2000||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|23 jul. 2000||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|19 set. 2000||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20000721