Images

Classifications

• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
  • H04M3/42—Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
  • H04M3/50—Centralised arrangements for answering calls; Centralised arrangements for recording messages for absent or busy subscribers ; Centralised arrangements for recording messages
  • H04M3/51—Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing
  • H04M3/5166—Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing in combination with interactive voice response systems or voice portals, e.g. as front-ends
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
  • H04M3/42—Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
  • H04M3/50—Centralised arrangements for answering calls; Centralised arrangements for recording messages for absent or busy subscribers ; Centralised arrangements for recording messages
  • H04M3/51—Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing
  • H04M3/523—Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing with call distribution or queueing
  • H04M3/5232—Call distribution algorithms
  • H04M3/5233—Operator skill based call distribution
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
  • H04M3/42—Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
  • H04M3/50—Centralised arrangements for answering calls; Centralised arrangements for recording messages for absent or busy subscribers ; Centralised arrangements for recording messages
  • H04M3/51—Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing
  • H04M3/523—Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing with call distribution or queueing
  • H04M3/5232—Call distribution algorithms
  • H04M3/5235—Dependent on call type or called number [DNIS]

Definitions

• One embodiment of the invention comprises a call processing system that is configured for assessing a priority of an incoming call, and determining whether to route the incoming call to an automated call processing system based on the assessed priority.
• the system is also configured for determining whether to route the incoming call to a human operator for processing based on the priority of the incoming call.
• a call processing system is configured for: (1) receiving data related to an incoming call; (2) assigning a priority value to the incoming call based on the data; and (3) using the priority value to determine whether to route the incoming call to an automated call processing system.
• the system may be configured for routing the incoming call to the automated call processing system in response to determining, based on the priority value, to route the incoming call to the automated call processing system.
• the system is configured for using the priority value to determine whether to route the incoming call to a human operator for processing.
• a call processing system is configured for: (1) receiving a call from a customer, the call being related to the cancellation of a service; (2) determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade the customer not to cancel the service; and (3) in response to determining that it would not be beneficial to attempt to persuade the customer not to cancel the service, routing the call to an automated call processing system.
• the step of determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade the customer not to cancel the service comprises assessing whether an account associated with the call is likely to be profitable in the future.
• the step of determining whether it would be beneficial to attempt to persuade the customer not to cancel the service comprises assessing whether an account associated with the call has been profitable in the past.
• a call processing system is configured for processing calls related to a service (such as an insurance policy) from one or more customers, and allowing at least one of the customers to cancel the service substantially without the assistance of a human operator.
• a service such as an insurance policy
• a call processing system is configured for: (1) receiving information related to an incoming call; (2) using the information to determine whether it would be beneficial to have a human representative handle the incoming call; and (3) in response to determining that it would not be beneficial to have a human representative handle the incoming call, routing the call to an automated call processing system.
• the system is configured for, in response to determining that it would be beneficial to have a human representative handle the incoming call, routing the call to a human representative for processing.
• a call processing system is configured for: (1) assessing the importance of an incoming call; and (2) routing the incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on the importance of the incoming call.
• at least one particular agent within the group of agents is assigned to the group of agents based on the particular agent's talent for performing one or more particular tasks.
• this talent is the particular agent's talent for persuading customers not to cancel a service.
• the system is configured for measuring the particular agent's talent for persuading customers to retain a service based on data comprising the length of time that one or more customers retained a service after speaking with the particular agent.
• the system is configured for measuring the particular agent's talent for persuading customers to retain a service based, at least in part, on the particular agent's call save rate for one or more days.
• the system is configured for measuring the particular agent's talent for persuading customers to retain a service based, at least in part, on the particular agent's saved revenue value for one or more days.
• a call processing system is configured for: (1) assessing the importance of an incoming call; and (2) routing the incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on the importance of the incoming call, wherein at least one particular agent within the group of agents has been assigned to the group of agents based on the particular agent's save rate performance.
• a call processing system is configured for: (1) assessing the importance of an incoming call; and (2) routing the incoming call to a particular group of agents for processing based on the importance of the incoming call, wherein at least one particular agent within the group of agents has been assigned to the group of agents based on a the particular agent's retention rating.
• a method of routing a call for processing comprises: (1) identifying, from a plurality of agents, a group of one or more “most talented” agents who are among the most talented agents within the plurality of agents at performing at least one task; (2) assessing the value of a particular call (such as an incoming call); and (3) determining whether to route the particular call to the group of “most talented agents” for processing based on the assessed value of the particular call.
• This method may further comprise routing the particular call to the group of “most talented agents” in response to determining that the particular call is a relatively high-value call.
• the “at least one task” referenced above comprises persuading a customer not to cancel a service.
• a method may further comprise: (1) identifying, from the plurality of agents, a group of one or more “least talented” agents who are among the least talented agents within the plurality of agents at performing one or more tasks; and (2) determining whether to route the particular call to the group of “least talented agents” for processing based on the assessed value of the particular call.
• a method of routing a call for processing comprises: (1) identifying, from a plurality of agents, a group of one or more “least talented” agents who are among the least talented agents within the plurality of agents at performing one or more tasks; (2) assessing the value of a particular call; and (3) determining whether to route the particular call to the group of “least talented agents” for processing based on the assessed value of the particular call.
• This method may further comprise routing the call to the group of “least talented agents” in response to determining that the call is a relatively low-value call.
• a method of routing calls comprises: (1) assigning a first talent rating to a first agent; (2) assigning a second talent rating to a second agent; (3) assigning a third talent rating to a third agent; (4) in response to the first talent rating being above a pre-determined first threshold value, assigning the first agent to a first group of agents; (5) in response to the second talent rating being below a pre-determined second threshold value, assigning the second agent to a second group of agents; (6) in response to the third talent rating being below the first threshold value and above the second threshold value, assigning the third agent to a third group of agents; (7) determining a value of a call; and (8) routing a call to a selected one of the first, second, or third groups of agents based, at least in part, on the value of the call.
• At least one of the first, second, or third talent ratings corresponds to an agent's ability to persuade a customer to retain a service. In another embodiment of the invention, at least one of the first, second, or third talent values corresponds to an agent's ability to persuade a customer not to cancel a service.
• a method of routing a correspondence for processing comprises: (1) identifying, from a plurality of agents, a group of one or more “most talented” agents who are among the most talented agents within the plurality of agents at performing at least one task; (2) assessing the value of a particular correspondence; and (3) determining whether to route the particular correspondence to the group of “most talented agents” for processing based on the assessed value of the particular call.
• this method further comprises: (1) identifying, from the plurality of agents, a group of one or more “least talented” agents who are among the least talented agents within the plurality of agents at performing one or more tasks; and (2) determining whether to route the particular call to the group of “least talented agents” for processing based on the assessed value of the particular call.
• FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a call processing system according to one embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a call routing and processing server according to one embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 3 is a flow chart that corresponds to a call routing module according to one embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 4 is a flow chart that corresponds to an automated call processing module according to one embodiment of the invention.
• FIG. 5 is a flow chart that corresponds to a call assignment module according to one embodiment of the invention.
• the present invention may be embodied, for example, as a method, a data processing system, or a computer program product. Accordingly, the present invention may take the form, for example, of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or an embodiment having both software and hardware components. Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product on a computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program code embodied in the storage medium. Any suitable computer-readable storage medium may be utilized including hard disks, CD-ROMs, optical storage devices, or magnetic storage devices.
• These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instructions for implementing the functions specified in the various flowchart block or blocks.
• the computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process.
• the instructions that are executed on the computer or other programmable apparatus may serve to implement the functions specified in the flowchart block or blocks.
• blocks of the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations and the text of this patent application support systems and methods for performing the specified functions, as well as computer readable media storing computer-executable instructions for performing the specified functions. It will also be understood that each block within the flowchart illustrations, and combinations of blocks within the flowchart illustrations, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based computer systems that perform the specified functions or steps, or by combinations of computer hardware and computer instructions.
• FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a call processing system 10 according to one embodiment of the present invention.
• this exemplary call processing system 10 includes a Call Routing and Processing Server 50 , a database 45 , an automated phone system 40 (also known as an “automated attendant”), and one or more communications networks 35 for facilitating communication between one or more customers 30 , 31 , 32 and both the automated phone system 40 and the Call Routing and Processing Server 50 .
• These one or more communications networks 35 may include any of a variety of types of networks such as a public switch telephone network (PSTN), the Internet, a private intranet, or any other type of suitable network.
• the communications network 35 comprises a public switch telephone network (PSTN).
• PSTN public switch telephone network
• FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the Call Routing and Processing Server 50 of FIG. 1 .
• the Call Routing and Processing Server 50 includes a processor 60 that communicates with other elements within the Call Routing and Processing Server 50 via a system interface or bus 61 .
• a display device/input device 64 for receiving and displaying data. This display device/input device 64 may be, for example, a keyboard or pointing device that is used in combination with a monitor.
• the Call Routing and Processing Server 50 further includes memory 66 , which preferably includes both read only memory (ROM) 65 and random access memory (RAM) 67 .
• the Call Routing and Processing Server's ROM 65 is used to store a basic input/output system 68 (BIOS) that contains the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the Call Routing and Processing Server 50 .
• BIOS basic input/output system 68
• the Call Routing and Processing Server 50 includes one or more storage devices 63 , such as a hard disk drive, a floppy disk drive, a CD Rom drive, or optical disk drive, for storing information on one or more types of computer-readable media, such as hard disks, removable magnetic disks, or CD-ROM disks.
• storage devices 63 such as a hard disk drive, a floppy disk drive, a CD Rom drive, or optical disk drive, for storing information on one or more types of computer-readable media, such as hard disks, removable magnetic disks, or CD-ROM disks.
• each of these storage devices 63 is connected to the system bus 61 via an appropriate interface.
• the storage devices 63 and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage for the Call Routing and Processing Server 50 .
• computer-readable media described above may include any other suitable type of computer-readable media known in the art.
• Such media include, for example, magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, and Bernoulli cartridges.
• a number of program modules may be stored by the various storage devices and within the server's RAM 67 .
• Such program modules include an operating system 80 , a Call Routing Module 100 , an Automated Call Processing Module 200 , and a Call Assignment Module 300 .
• the Call Routing Module 100 , Automated Call Processing Module 200 , and Call Assignment Module 300 control certain aspects of the operation of the Call Routing and Processing Server 50 with the assistance of the processor 60 and an operating system 80 .
• the Call Routing and Processing Server 50 also includes a network interface 74 for interfacing and communicating with other elements of a computer network. It will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in this field that one or more of the Call Routing and Processing Server 50 components may be located geographically remotely from other Call Routing and Processing Server 50 components. Furthermore, one or more of the server's components may be combined, and additional components for performing functions described herein may be included in the Call Routing and Processing Server 50 .
• a “saved call” occurs when an agent persuades a customer not to cancel a service or policy. For example, if a customer calls to cancel a particular insurance policy and an agent convinces the customer to not cancel the policy, the agent is credited with saving the call.
• a system and method according to one embodiment of the invention is configured for routing and processing incoming telephone calls.
• one embodiment of the invention is specifically configured for routing incoming telephone calls from customers who wish to cancel an existing insurance policy.
• various different embodiments of the invention may be applied to routing many different types of telephone calls or other types of correspondence within many different industries.
• various different embodiments of the invention may be applied to handling calls involving customer complaints, insurance claims, repair requests, or other types of calls or correspondence.
• a particular embodiment of the invention is configured for routing telephone calls from customers who wish to cancel an existing insurance policy.
• incoming calls are first routed to an automated phone system 40 .
• This automated phone system preferably determines the insurance policy at issue and verifies that the caller has the authority to make changes to the policy in a manner known in the art.
• the system prompts the user to enter their insurance policy number along with information that only the account holder (or someone closely associated with the account holder) would know. Such information may include, for example, a PIN number or the account holder's mother's maiden name.
• the system may use the account holder's home phone number to retrieve their account information from a database.
• Step 110 the system first executes Step 110 where it determines the value of the call.
• any appropriate technique may be used to assign a value to a particular incoming call.
• Such techniques may take into account, for example, various factors including: (1) the monetary value of the account that is the subject of the call; (2) the amount of time that the account has been open; (3) the payment history associated with the account; (4) the customer history associated with the account (for example, if the customer tends to complain persistently, the customer's account, and therefore the call, may be of less value than a similar account for a customer that does not frequently complain); (5) future indicators of the profitability of the account; and (6) one or more manually-assigned call priority indicators.
• each call is assigned a numeric value rating of 0 through 10, where 0 corresponds to a call of no value and 10 corresponds to an extremely valuable call.
• 0 corresponds to a call of no value
• 10 corresponds to an extremely valuable call.
• a variety of different systems may be used for rating the various calls. These systems may involve, for example, assigning a numeric rating to the calls or simply associating the calls with a non-numerical priority indicator, such as “high value”, “medium value”, “low value” or “no value”.
• Step 120 determines whether the determined value of the call is below a pre-determined threshold value. In one embodiment of the invention, the system does this by comparing the determined call value (which may, for example, be a numeric value) with a predetermined threshold value (which may also be a numeric value). If the determined call value is below the threshold value, the system proceeds to Step 140 , where it executes an Automated Call Processing Module 140 .
• the Automated Call Processing Module 140 allows the caller to take a requested action (such as canceling an insurance policy) without assistance from a human representative.
• the system is configured to allow callers to cancel very low value insurance policies in an automated manner without first speaking with a customer service representative.
• Step 120 determines, at Step 120 , that the value of the call is not below the pre-determined threshold value, the system proceeds to Step 130 where it executes a Call Assignment Module 130 .
• the Call Assignment Module 300 routes the call to an appropriate group of customer service representatives (i.e., “agents”) for processing.
• agents customer service representatives
• the system is configured to require callers to speak to a customer service representative before canceling insurance policies that are not regarded as “very low value” policies.
• the Automated Call Processing Module 200 and the Call Assignment Module 300 are discussed in greater detail below.
• FIG. 4 is a flow chart depicting an automated call processing module 200 according to one embodiment of the invention.
• the system requests that the caller confirm that they wish to take the requested action. If the system determines, at Step 220 , that the caller has confirmed that they wish to take the requested action, the system proceeds to Step 240 where it executes the requested action. However, if the system determines, at Step 220 , that the caller has not confirmed that they wish to take the requested action, the system proceeds to Step 230 , where it transfers the call to a customer service representative for processing.
• the system is configured to automatically process the cancellation of certain very low value insurance policies without human intervention.
• the system requests that the customer confirm that they wish to cancel their insurance policy. If the customer confirms that they wish to cancel the policy, the system proceeds to Step 240 where it cancels the policy substantially without, and preferably entirely without, human intervention. However, if the system determines, at Step 220 , that the customer has not confirmed that they wish to cancel the insurance policy, the system proceeds to Step 230 where it transfers the call to a customer service representative for processing.
• the functionality described above is useful in automatically canceling low-value insurance policies (or other services) without substantial (and preferably entirely without) human intervention. This reduces the overall cost associated with processing these cancellations.
• FIG. 5 is a flow chart depicting an exemplary Call Assignment Module 300 according to one embodiment of the invention.
• Step 310 determines whether the incoming call is a high priority call.
• the system may do this, for example, by comparing the call value determined at Step 110 (which, in one embodiment of the invention, is a numeric value) with a first pre-determined threshold value. If the value of the call is above this first threshold value, the system determines that the call is a “high priority” call and proceeds to Step 320 where it routes the call to a first group of agents for processing. However, if the value of the call is not above the first threshold value, the system determines that the call is not a high priority call and advances to Step 330 .
• the system determines whether the call is a medium priority call. In one embodiment of the invention, the system does this by comparing the call value determined at Step 110 (which, in one embodiment of the invention, is a numeric value) with a second pre-determined threshold value, which in one embodiment of the invention is lower than the first threshold value. If the call value is above this second threshold value, the system concludes that the call is a “medium priority” call and proceeds to Step 340 where it routes the call to a second group of agents for processing. However, if the call value is not above the second threshold value, the system determines that the call is a low priority call and advances to Step 350 , where it routes the call to a third group of agents for processing.
• the Call Assignment Module 300 serves to direct calls to different groups of agents based upon the priority of the calls.
• the priority of the calls corresponds directly to the value of the call determined at Step 110 .
• the priority of a call may be determined in any other appropriate way.
• each agent from a pool of two or more agents is assigned to a first, second, or third agent group based upon the agent's talent at performing one or more particular tasks.
• agents are assigned to the various groups of agents based upon their talent for: (1) persuading customers not to cancel a service; and/or (2) persuading customers to retain a service for an extended period of time.
• agents may be assigned to one (or more) of the first, second, and third groups of agents, for example, based upon their talent for: (1) persuading customers not to cancel an existing insurance policy; and/or (2) persuading customers to retain an existing insurance policy.
• the system when dividing a pool of two or more available agents into various groups of agents, the system first assesses each age's talent for performing one or more particular tasks, such as the tasks mentioned above. In one embodiment of the invention, the system then assigns each agent a numerical “talent rating”. Once this is done for all of the agents within a pool, the agents are ranked on the basis of their assigned talent rating.
• the system determines how many agents are needed within each particular agent group.
• the system may do this by agent group size requirements that have been entered manually into the system by a human group coordinator.
• the system may use historical data to estimate a predicted number of incoming “high value” calls that are to be handled by agents on a particular shift.
• the system may then use additional historical data, or other types of data, to estimate the number of agents needed to handle the estimated number of “high value” calls.
• the system then repeats this process to estimate the number of agents needed to handle the pre-determined number of “medium value” and “low value” calls.
• all (or a majority of) “high value” calls are preferably handled by an agent group that is made entirely of (or primarily of) the most talented agents from an available pool of one or more agents.
• this agent group is referred to as a first group of agents.
• the system identifies the number of agents needed handle the predicted number of “high value” calls, and then assigns this number of top-ranked agents to fill the first group of agents. For example, if the system determines that seven agents are needed process “high value” calls for a particular shift, the system will assign the seven highest ranked agents to fill the first group of agents for that particular shift.
• the system follows a similar approach to assigning agents to the group of agents that is to handle “medium value” calls, which in one embodiment of the invention is referred to as a second group of agents.
• the system identifies the number of agents needed to handle the predicted number of “medium value” calls, and then assigns this number of the remaining top-ranked agents (i.e., the top-ranked agents that remain after the first agent group has been filled) to fill the second group.
• the system determines that ten agents are needed process “medium value” calls for a certain shift, and if the system has assigned the first seven agents to the first group of agents, the system will assign the eighth through seventeenth highest-ranked agents to fill the second group of agents for that shift.
• the system follows a similar approach to assigning agents to the group of agents that is to handle “low value” calls, which in one embodiment of the invention is referred to as a third group of agents.
• the system identifies the number of agents needed to handle the predicted number of “low value” calls, and then assigns this number of the remaining top-ranked agents (i.e., the top-ranked agents that remain after the first and second agent groups have been filled) to fill the third group.
• the system determines that five agents are needed process “low value” calls for a certain shift, and if the system has assigned the first seventeen agents to the first and second groups of agents, the system will assign the eighteenth through twenty-second highest-ranked agents to fill the third group of agents for that shift.
• the various agents are ranked on the basis of a performance rating score that takes into account one or more of the following: (1) the agent's average daily save rate percentage; (2) the agent's average daily saved revenue percentage; and (3) the agent's average monthly persistency rate.
• each agent is assigned a performance rating score that is based on all of these factors as calculated for the previous month. In one embodiment of the invention, all of these factors are weighted equally in assigning each agent a performance rating score.
• each agent's performance rating score is equal to the sum of the standardized values of: (1) the agent's average daily save rate percentage (e.g., for the previous month); (2) the agent's average daily saved revenue percentage (e.g., for the previous month); and (3) the agent's current average monthly persistency rate.
• an agent's daily save rate is equal to the number of calls that they “save” within a day divided by the number of calls that they handled within that same day that were eligible to be saved. Thus, if, in a particular day, an agent handled 200 calls that were eligible to be saved, and if the agent saved 100 of those eligible calls, the agent would have a daily save rate of 0.5, and a daily save rate percentage of 50%.
• an agent's daily saved revenue value is equal to the amount of revenue that an agent saved within a particular day (e.g., by persuading customers not to cancel an existing service) divided by the amount of revenue that the agent could have saved if they would have saved every call that they handled on that particular day. Accordingly, if, in a particular day, a particular agent saved 50 calls corresponding to a total of $1,000 worth of revenue, but handled a total of 200 calls corresponding to a total of $4,000 worth of revenue, the agent's daily saved revenue value for that particular day would be 0.25 and the agent's daily saved revenue percentage would be 25%.
• an agent's persistency rating is a numerical value based on the total number of months that the agent's previous “saves” remain in effect.
• a “save” remains in effect for as long as the account or service at issue in a particular “saved” call remains in effect. For example, if a customer calls to cancel a particular insurance policy and an agent convinces the customer to not cancel the policy, the agent is credited with saving the call. If the customer then waits for six months after speaking with the agent to cancel the policy, the agent's “save” will be regarded as having remained in effect for six months.
• the various available agents are ranked based upon their performance rating score and then assigned to one or more groups of agents based upon this performance rating score. For example, in one embodiment of the invention, each agent of a plurality of agents (e.g., the total pool of available agents) is assigned to a particular one of a plurality of agent groups (e.g., 3 groups) based upon their performance rating score. In a particular embodiment, the available agents that are ranked within the top 30% of these agents (e.g., based on their performance rating score) are assigned to a “high-value call” agent group.
• the available agents that are ranked within the bottom 30% of the agents are assigned to a “low-value call” agent group.
• All of the other agents are then assigned to a “medium-value call” agent group.
• all new agents are placed into the “low-value call” agent group until their performance rating score is sufficient to place them in another group.
• the system routes calls so that high priority calls are handled by a group of agents that are the most talented at handling a particular type of call (e.g., a call requesting cancellation of an insurance claim). Similarly, medium priority calls are handled by a second-most talented group of agents, and low priority calls are handled by a third-most talented group of agents.
• a call is routed to a particular group of agents, the call is placed in a queue so that the call is handled by the first available agent within that group, regardless of the agent's talent rating.
• calls are automatically routed for processing to the most talented available agent within the group.
• a call if a call has been in a queue for a particular group of agents for a pre-determined period of time, the call is automatically redirected to a “backup” group of agents for processing. For example, in one embodiment of the invention, once a call has been in a queue for the first group of agents for more than two minutes, the call is automatically redirected to the second group of agents for processing. Similarly, once a call has been in a queue for the second group of agents for more than two minutes, the call is automatically redirected to the first group of agents for processing. By the same token, once a call has been in a queue for the third group of agents for more than two minutes, the call is automatically redirected to the second group of agents for processing. As will be understood by one skilled in this field in light of this disclosure, this setup for handling overflow calls may be modified to suit the needs of the particular system at issue.
• the system may use more or less than three agent groups to handle these calls.
• the system uses only two groups to handle all incoming calls.
• the system may be configured to not include an automated call processing feature.
• the system after executing the step of determining a value of the call at Step 110 , the system proceeds directly to the step of executing the Call Assignment Module 300 .
• Steps 120 and 140 the steps of determining whether a call is below a threshold value and, if so, executing the Automated Call Processing Module are eliminated.

Abstract

Description

Claims (67)

Priority Applications (10)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Related Child Applications (1)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=33511173

Family Applications (4)

Family Applications After (3)

Country Status (7)

Cited By (85)

Families Citing this family (70)

Citations (24)

Family Cites Families (36)

• 2003
  • 2003-06-13 US US10/461,071 patent/US7050566B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
• 2004
  • 2004-06-14 ES ES04755347.4T patent/ES2584454T3/en active Active
  • 2004-06-14 BR BRPI0411449A patent/BRPI0411449A2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 2004-06-14 WO PCT/US2004/019117 patent/WO2004114641A1/en active Search and Examination
  • 2004-06-14 MX MXPA05013563A patent/MXPA05013563A/en active IP Right Grant
  • 2004-06-14 CA CA002529210A patent/CA2529210A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2004-06-14 US US10/868,752 patent/US7062031B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 2004-06-14 EP EP04755347.4A patent/EP1636976B1/en not_active Not-in-force
• 2005
  • 2005-12-16 US US11/305,058 patent/US7593521B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
• 2009
  • 2009-08-13 US US12/583,059 patent/US8422659B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime

Patent Citations (28)

Non-Patent Citations (51)

Also Published As

Similar Documents